Gun Zone Deals

National Emergency on Southern Border

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • gshayd

    Ugliest house on the block.
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 25, 2018
    1,307
    96
    Beaumont, Texas
    if you don't have enough votes to override a Presidential Veto How the Senate of Congress votes is irrelevant. I believe that President Trump used the laws that Congress gave him to declare a National Emergency. Even the New York times who falsely reported it was not an emergency is now like damn this is an emergency. What the Democrats don't realize is that Judge Shopping can and will be used against the Next Democratic President. I believe that the USSC will tell Congress if you didn't mean for the President to have this power you need to go back and fix it. The President is within his powers to do so.
    Target Sports
     

    diesel1959

    por vida
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 7, 2013
    3,837
    96
    Houston & BFE
    I agree with most of this. The Dems will Judge shop it so it goes to the 9th court of appeals . a TRO might placed on wall building. It will have to go to the supremes.
    The Supreme Court has recently tipped its hand that it is NOT going to look very kindly upon District Judges abusing the nationwide injunction thing in the future. I believe that a shopped District may very well hold against the administration; however, only after a hearing on the merits, and then it's game-on to the Appellate Circuit and, eventually, to the Supremes--where POTUS WILL win on this matter. #WINNING!
     

    diesel1959

    por vida
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 7, 2013
    3,837
    96
    Houston & BFE
    Terrible ambivalence.

    I want the wall. I think it's needed.

    I don't like that the Dem's won't give Trump the money.

    I hate that Trump is manufacturing an emergency when there is none.

    I want the federal money moved from lesser projects to the wall.

    I fear a future Dem president declaring gun availability an emergency.


    What, oh what, should I pray for tonight?


    And......oh......look. My timer on my coffee bean roaster is alarming.

    H




    .
    It's not a manufactured emergency. That's bullshît Dem talking point crud.
     

    diesel1959

    por vida
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 7, 2013
    3,837
    96
    Houston & BFE
    It is. They are not undocumented immigrants, they are illegal migrants. Period. Immigrants want to come here and assimilate into our culture legally with a clear path to citizenship. Illegal migrants are only concerned with what they can take from us. Essentially, although they are not military, they are civilian invaders plundering our Country to enrich their own lives. Much like the Vikings did.

    Proof you say????
    What flag are they waving? It damn sure ain't ours.

    Sent by an idjit coffeeholic from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
    They are line-jumpers--no different than someone cutting in front of you while waiting in line for movie tickets, or to get into a club, or to buy concert tickets, or Astros tickets, etc. Line-cutters suck and need to be dealt with. It is offensive as hell.
     

    gshayd

    Ugliest house on the block.
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 25, 2018
    1,307
    96
    Beaumont, Texas
    The term wet back maybe offensive to some but I find the term undocumented migrant Just as offensive.
    You are right it is offensive. There is no such term as an undocumented immigrant. It is illegal immigrant. You are here legally or you are here illegally. If you don't have documents allowing you to be here you are illegal. immigrant and should be subject to breaking the law. If you are seeking asulum there is a procedure for seeking asylum. As the UN says the first country you come to is the place you file for asylum. America is not the first country illegal immigrants come to. Therefore you are not entitled to and are illegally applying for asylum in the United States.
     

    HKShooter65

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    There is no such term as an undocumented immigrant. It is illegal immigrant. You are here legally or you are here illegally. If you don't have documents allowing you to be here you are illegal. immigrant and should be subject to breaking the law. If you are seeking asulum there is a procedure for seeking asylum. As the UN says the first country you come to is the place you file for asylum. America is not the first country illegal immigrants come to. Therefore you are not entitled to and are illegally applying for asylum in the United States.

    The majority of this last month's surge in apprehensions is that there more kids and complete family units. They are fleeing terrible living situations.
    We cannot absorb all of them.
    We are obligated to process all asylum seekers.

    I'm fact-checking the concept that the UN 1948 Human Rights Resolution or the subsequent embellishments and clarifying edicts contain any verbiage related to the "first country you come to" allegation.

    I cannot find anything.
    That would be immensely important, if true.

    Do you have a link to support the "first country you come to" concept??
     

    diesel1959

    por vida
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 7, 2013
    3,837
    96
    Houston & BFE
    The majority of this last month's surge in apprehensions is that there more kids and complete family units. They are fleeing terrible living situations.
    We cannot absorb all of them.
    We are obligated to process all asylum seekers.

    I'm fact-checking the concept that the UN 1948 Human Rights Resolution or the subsequent embellishments and clarifying edicts contain any verbiage related to the "first country you come to" allegation.

    I cannot find anything.
    That would be immensely important, if true.

    Do you have a link to support the "first country you come to" concept??
    Check out Article 31 of the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/StatusOfRefugees.aspx

    "Article 31 - Refugees unlawfully in the country of refuge


    1. The Contracting States shall not impose penalties, on account of their illegal entry or presence, on refugees who, coming directly from a territory where their life or freedom was threatened in the sense of article 1, enter or are present in their territory without authorization, provided they present themselves without delay to the authorities and show good cause for their illegal entry or presence.


    2. The Contracting States shall not apply to the movements of such refugees restrictions other than those which are necessary and such restrictions shall only be applied until their status in the country is regularized or they obtain admission into another country. The Contracting States shall allow such refugees a reasonable period and all the necessary facilities to obtain admission into another country.
    "

    Oh, and Article 32 provides that the receiving nation may expel refugees on the grounds of "national security" or "public order".
     
    Last edited:

    diesel1959

    por vida
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 7, 2013
    3,837
    96
    Houston & BFE
    The migrant caravans from Central America passed ALL OF MEXICO, and something like a half-dozen American Consulates and the American Embassy during their transit through Mexico. In so doing, they should have claimed asylum in Mexico and, short of that, should have presented themselves at one of the consulates or the embassy. There is absolutely no need (other than to create a public scene that the open borders leftist's love) for the migrants to cross the US-Mexico border illegally. It's all a game.
     

    gshayd

    Ugliest house on the block.
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 25, 2018
    1,307
    96
    Beaumont, Texas
    Here is what I found.... https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/asylum-united-states

    If a person doesn't apply for asylum within one year of entering the country they will be barred from receiving asylum. So if you come across the border and have not applied for asylum within 12 months you can not get asylum. If you crossed the border illegally you can go to any Border patrol agent and they will take you somewhere to get the process started. Anybody who poses a danger to the U.S. is barred from requesting asylum. If you have been here a year and haven't bothered to sign up for asylum then it wasn't why you came here. If you say I came here to improve my economic conditions that isn't ground for asylum. There are some limited exceptions for the one year period.

    Asylum seekers are not entitled to legal representation.

    Let you peruse the rest of it for yourself
     

    satx78247

    Member, Emeritus
    Emeritus - "Texas Proud"
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Jun 23, 2014
    8,479
    96
    78208
    To All,

    I cannot decide if the LEFTIST DIMocRATS:
    1. cannot understand that there IS a severe emergency on our southern border
    OR
    2. they are just lying about the real emergency
    OR
    3. they are both STUPID & DISHONEST.


    Whichever of those options is the truth, the DIMs must be DESTROYED as a group that can ever control the government of the USA.

    just my OPINION, satx
     

    easy rider

    Summer Slacker
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 10, 2015
    31,489
    96
    Odessa, Tx
    The majority of this last month's surge in apprehensions is that there more kids and complete family units. They are fleeing terrible living situations.
    We cannot absorb all of them.
    We are obligated to process all asylum seekers.
    Asylum is for political reasons (threat of death), not poor living conditions.
     

    satx78247

    Member, Emeritus
    Emeritus - "Texas Proud"
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Jun 23, 2014
    8,479
    96
    78208
    karlac,

    Fyi, I find NO "news" outlet that is reporting this information, EXCEPT Fox.
    Could the silence be because the judge is a LEFTIST DIMocRAT extremist??

    yours, satx
     

    phoenix

    Active Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 10, 2014
    377
    26
    That judge needs to do time. And some dont know this but illegal invaders can break in, be here awhile then when caught years later cry asylum
     
    Every Day Man
    Tyrant

    Support

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    116,119
    Messages
    2,953,345
    Members
    34,941
    Latest member
    Irowland1994
    Top Bottom