Yep. As many have stated, both were jerks but I think this sends a bad message to legally armed citizens. The message is - don't challenge anyone or anything. Bullies and/or the govt. Do not want you to chanllenge them.......for your safety of course. Just STFU and accept the uncivil behavior if you know what is good for you.Lots of times bullies are really pussies.
They don't expect to get challenged....
https://github.com/iamadamdev?tab=repositoriesNot paying, not turning off ad blocker
......On the bright side he can relax and stop worrying about handicapped parking cause every trip will be door to door service.
.....
Yep. As many have stated, both were jerks but I think this sends a bad message to legally armed citizens. The message is - don't challenge anyone or anything. Bullies and/or the govt. Do not want you to chanllenge them.......for your safety of course. Just STFU and accept the uncivil behavior if you know what is good for you.
His mistake was not just calling 911 and waiting over an hour to report a supposed illegal parking incident that had left long ago. You should not go to prison for being a jerk and pushing someone down on the cement is an iffy proposition on how much oxygen you will continue take in.
FX has this show called Mr. Inbetween and in the opening episode, he tells his daughter that bullies exist because no one confronts them. That is about right.
Sent from my SM-T380 using Tapatalk
Well considering the lice population in some prisons he will have a full time hobby all read to go.I guess now he will be arguing with inmates over his lunch spot at the cafeteria. Some people are just nit picks.
I am surprised this type of situation doesn't get more media attention by the anti gunners: It seems to me to be pretty clear that IF the shooter really felt there was an on-going threat of bodily harm after he was on the ground that it almost completely disappeared when he drew his gun and the pusher backed off. Of course, we can't tell from the shitty video if the shooter was super-woozy or disoriented at that point. If he was, he may have interpreted ANY movement by the pusher as aggressive and threatening, perhaps unable to tell if he was backing off vs closing the distance.
I think we might be surprised at how many people would have done exactly what the shooter did in that situation.
I think regardless of their past history of stupid mistakes, aggressive behavior and instigation, literally anyone who isn't disqualified from owning a firearm should own and carry, anywhere, but I also think that this exact situation would be far more common, for a while, if that were the case.
Yes, from earlier link: guilty of manslaughter.Sentencing for what? Is there a verdict?
Ketamine or Jack? What ever it is I want some.Sentencing for what? Is there a verdict?
That's what he's paid to be.What a long-winded Monday morning quarterback that lawyer is.
I don't think he should have said anything to her!A word to the woman parked in the handicap space was appropriate