Military Camp

If you are hopeful of winning again in 2022 think aqain.

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Aus_Schwaben

    First to know - Last to care!
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Jan 31, 2019
    3,760
    96
    Abilene, TX
    There will never again be a fair and honest election in the Communist Country of The United States. States, counties, cities, and towns.
    Lord, have mercy on us.
    That was the concern for a lot of voters, that is, 2020 would be the last free and fair elections in the U.S. if the Communists won. We are in the same position a lot of the eastern European countries were in about '47. The communists used the same tactics as the Nazis to when the elections and, once they did, began consolidating power to ensure only they would ever win elections again.


    GEOS Spetznatz MI6 Sleeper FSB NKVD Tajni FMWS Global Reach Igla Ganef Guild Skype HAHO Maguire Javelin OPSEC HUMINT
     

    Dougw1515

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 14, 2020
    3,488
    96
    USA
    Somebody help me out here. By n' large voting is a State function. What Federal rules/laws there are relative to voting are contained in the Constitution. Seems to me this would be two things HUGE Federal over-reach AND Constitutional amendments which would need to be ratified by the States. Right? Wrong?
     

    Antares

    Well-Known
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 29, 2015
    1,516
    96
    Seabrook, TX
    The Supreme Court was very helpful during the last election and even in hearing the state legislators case to them from PA,and Texas not to mention even when those legislators sent dueling electors to congress. Who is going to stop them.
     

    Antares

    Well-Known
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 29, 2015
    1,516
    96
    Seabrook, TX
    We better do something fast before it is too late I wrote mcconnell several times and graham when he looked like he was agreeing with mitch. I wish I was younger to be more active, but it is hard to yell charge full speed ahead in a mobility scooter given to me by the VA.
     

    Dougw1515

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 14, 2020
    3,488
    96
    USA
    We better do something fast before it is too late I wrote mcconnell several times and graham when he looked like he was agreeing with mitch. I wish I was younger to be more active, but it is hard to yell charge full speed ahead in a mobility scooter given to me by the VA.
    We do what we can with what we have...
     

    busykngt

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 14, 2011
    4,730
    96
    McKinney
    Here's the thing: statehood for DC and/or PR will seal the deal. And Congress won't be stopping that.
    --
    If legal action does rise to the level of SCOTUS, expect SCOTUS to not agree to hear it - at least until after midterm election results are known.

    Operating under the assumption that SCOTUS themselves, have a desire to stay at nine Justices, they will not agree to hear any cases that would potentially anger the Democrats and lead to Democrats "packing the court" with two to four new liberal Justices.

    IF the midterms should result in the Senate or House returning to Republican control, then SCOTUS will feel some semblance of balance has returned and would likely hear more controversial cases.
     
    Last edited:

    IndyDave1776

    Active Member
    Emeritus - "Texas Proud"
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 9, 2021
    285
    76
    Indiana
    Somebody help me out here. By n' large voting is a State function. What Federal rules/laws there are relative to voting are contained in the Constitution. Seems to me this would be two things HUGE Federal over-reach AND Constitutional amendments which would need to be ratified by the States. Right? Wrong?
    Sniff and Blow, their comrades in congress, and the puppetmasters controlling all of the above don't give 3/16 of a damn about law or Constitution. Ditto for federalism.
     

    Dougw1515

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 14, 2020
    3,488
    96
    USA
    Here's the thing: statehood for DC and/or PR will seal the deal. And Congress won't be stopping that.
    --
    If legal action does rise to the level of SCOTUS, expect SCOTUS to not agree to hear it - at least until after midterm election results are known.

    Operating under the assumption that SCOTUS themselves, have a desire to stay at nine Justices, they will not agree to hear any cases that would potentially anger the Democrats and lead to Democrats "packing the court" with three to five new liberal Justices.

    IF the midterms should result in the Senate or House returning to Republican control, then SCOTUS will feel some semblance of balance has returned and would likely hear more controversial cases.
    With the full understanding that everything you just posted is speculation/opinion on your part. Not saying you're not 100% correct but I wouldn't exactly plan on the outcome/events taking place as you described.
     

    IndyDave1776

    Active Member
    Emeritus - "Texas Proud"
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 9, 2021
    285
    76
    Indiana
    With the full understanding that everything you just posted is speculation/opinion on your part. Not saying you're not 100% correct but I wouldn't exactly plan on the outcome/events taking place as you described.
    Those are ideas the left has been floating for a while, and the justices have developed a pattern of hiding under their benches hoping anything controversial goes away.
     

    Dougw1515

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 14, 2020
    3,488
    96
    USA
    Those are ideas the left has been floating for a while, and the justices have developed a pattern of hiding under their benches hoping anything controversial goes away.
    What I know is every time those dumbass dimms bend and contort the law to suit their immediate goals, someway or 'nuther it eventually ends up biting the squarely on the ass!
     

    Renegade

    SuperOwner
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 5, 2008
    11,749
    96
    Texas
    Here's the thing: statehood for DC and/or PR will seal the deal. And Congress won't be stopping that.
    --
    If legal action does rise to the level of SCOTUS, expect SCOTUS to not agree to hear it - at least until after midterm election results are known.

    Operating under the assumption that SCOTUS themselves, have a desire to stay at nine Justices, they will not agree to hear any cases that would potentially anger the Democrats and lead to Democrats "packing the court" with two to four new liberal Justices.

    This is how I see it playing it out too. In fact I think it started the day after Election day.
     

    Dougw1515

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 14, 2020
    3,488
    96
    USA
    Oh... for sure they want to do those things there is a chance that at some point the dimm party leaves a couple of setting Senators to the point they simply will no longer toe the party line. That too could happen!
     

    IndyDave1776

    Active Member
    Emeritus - "Texas Proud"
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 9, 2021
    285
    76
    Indiana
    Oh... for sure they want to do those things there is a chance that at some point the dimm party leaves a couple of setting Senators to the point they simply will no longer toe the party line. That too could happen!
    No argument. When traversing uncharted territory you have to be ready for anything in a very broad range.
     
    Top Bottom