Setting aside emotions on either topic, the intellectual and legal rigor the Roberts court is demonstrating shames the Warren and Berger courts.
And leading the shaming is Justice Thomas. Doing away with imaginary legal BS like "substantive due process" and replacing it with the Constitution, imagine that.
For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell. Because any substantive due process decision is “demonstrably erroneous,”
Ramos v. Louisiana, we have a duty to “correct the error” established in those precedents, Gamble v. United States, After overruling these demonstrably erroneous decisions, the question would remain whether other constitutional provisions guarantee the myriad rights that our substantive due process cases have generated. For example, we could consider whether any of the rights announced in this Court’s substantive due process cases are “privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States” protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.