Capitol Armory ad

Bye, Bye Roe V Wade

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • etmo

    Well-Known
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 25, 2020
    1,228
    96
    Cedar Creek, Tx
    Setting aside emotions on either topic, the intellectual and legal rigor the Roberts court is demonstrating shames the Warren and Berger courts.


    And leading the shaming is Justice Thomas. Doing away with imaginary legal BS like "substantive due process" and replacing it with the Constitution, imagine that.

    For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell. Because any substantive due process decision is “demonstrably erroneous,”
    Ramos v. Louisiana, we have a duty to “correct the error” established in those precedents, Gamble v. United States, After overruling these demonstrably erroneous decisions, the question would remain whether other constitutional provisions guarantee the myriad rights that our substantive due process cases have generated. For example, we could consider whether any of the rights announced in this Court’s substantive due process cases are “privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States” protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.
    Guns International
     

    Southpaw

    Forum BSer
    Rating - 100%
    14   0   0
    Mar 30, 2009
    17,897
    96
    Guadalupe Co.
    Get ready for Biden to pack the court.

    Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

    And then the Reps to do the same when the winds favor them and etc, etc. etc, till we have SCOTUS decisions that need to be decided by 101 Justices.

    Perhaps that is their plan, to make the court irrelevant, but I honestly don't think that works out in the Left's favor in the long run. I think that literally would be a death sentence for their kind. In a society without much order, the weak willed and loudest voices are usually the first to go.
     

    General Zod

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 29, 2012
    27,014
    96
    Kaufman County
    Perhaps that is their plan, to make the court irrelevant, but I honestly don't think that works out in the Left's favor in the long run.

    Since most of the Left's strategy involves passing legislation that violates our Constitutional protections, I'd say hamstringing the Supreme Court would very much work in their favor.
     

    easy rider

    Summer Slacker
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 10, 2015
    31,528
    96
    Odessa, Tx
    "We end this opinion where we began. Abortion presents a profound moral question. The Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating or prohibiting abortion. Roe and Casey arrogated that authority. We now overrule those decisions and return that authority to the people and their elected representatives," Justice Samuel Alito wrote in the court's opinion.
    Now if they would only use that same concept to overturn the many, many other federal laws that the Constitution doesn't prohibit.
     

    Southpaw

    Forum BSer
    Rating - 100%
    14   0   0
    Mar 30, 2009
    17,897
    96
    Guadalupe Co.
    Since most of the Left's strategy involves passing legislation that violates our Constitutional protections, I'd say hamstringing the Supreme Court would very much work in their favor.

    Sure, perhaps in a society based upon the order we have today. But, I said in a society without much order, because that is what the packing and eventual loss of SCOTUS would bring.
     
    Top Bottom