Yup, Big Mike was probably doing Brittney.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
They spit roast Big O on the weekends, or probably did, before Gulag-ville
Yup, Big Mike was probably doing Brittney.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Makes you wonder if some peter-puffing is going on in the Oval Office?Play Stupid Games, Win Stupid Prizes.
At this point, Russia could negotiate almost anything, Joe is so desperate to get her back.
Wouldn't be the first time....Makes you wonder if some peter-puffing is going on in the Oval Office?
……or cigar demolitionMakes you wonder if some peter-puffing is going on in the Oval Office?
Yep. No way will the Administration let this one go. At least Whelan might benefit by accident.
Swapping a notorious arms dealer for someone who is borderline anti-American? What a great deal. That reminds me of the time we gave Iran $75 billion for something like a bag of peanuts.
Perhaps if Joe assigned Kamala the task of negotiating the deal it would be possible...Wait, are you implying that our self-declared betters in the administration might be fuckwits who couldn't negotiate their way out of a damp paper bag? Because you'd be right.
I think we should bring her back. I don’t think we should trade an international arms dealer for her, but we should definitely work to get her back to the US. She did do something stupid and break their law, but 9 years for some hash oil is excessive and that sentence was definitely maxed out to spite us.
This countries first amendment is about freedom of speech and expression. Leaving her there because she hasn’t stood for our anthem is not a good sign to broadcast to the world. The US is a beacon of freedom of expression and in our history we have supported our own even if they might have had anti-US viewpoints.
For example, during the early days of the Cold War, the US govt bought paintings from various artists, like Georgia O’Keefe and others, some who expressed commie viewpoints, and worked with the Museum of Modern Art to display these across the world. Why? Because it shows that even if you have differing opinions, we won’t lock you up in a Gulag and toss the key. We did it then, and it was rather effective, we should continue to do it to this day, especially against Russia and Putin who is known to lock up opposing party leaders.
Laws "should" apply to everyone. which we know they don't.After all, smuggling is such a small crime. It should be legal everywhere.
Yup, sarcasm.
What about pot smugglers that get higher sentences in ther Countries than in the USA? Or Countries that say we are to strict on smugglers?
Which laws should we go by a instead of our own? I'm asking for our government because they can't seem to figure out what Laws apply to who. At what point of popularity or value to the government does the Law cease to apply?
Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk
While I cant see you my magic 8 ball says doubtful.DILLIGAF