Take that ATF!!!

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Deaf Smith

    Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 25, 2022
    93
    26
    Texas
    Well a year ago I got an AR-15, APF-15, pistol in .300 BLK. 7 inch barrel and sharkfin brace.

    1674956663492.png


    So the ATF gives this 300 page rule... I notice that if it is 120 oz or more you have to go through some impossible stuff...

    Well I put a regular buffer tube and an off set buis. Added a sling at the back under the tube.

    Shoots very well with 110 gr M1 carbine slugs and 296 powder and it gives over 2100 fps.

    To shoot it one grabs the barrel 'tube' and you thumb pushes forward against the front sight (and you might need a bit of padding on the back of the front sight!)

    You also push forward on the pistol grip so the sling is tight. Cheek is on the buffer tube. Quite steady a hold folks!

    Talking about 50 yard 3 inch groups standing leaning against a post. Good enough for deer inside the woods.

    And get this... I took it apart and weighed all the components, INCLUDING the sling!!

    117 oz!

    Hahahahaha.... it is still a pistol! I don't even have to read all the "If's, and's, or but's" stuff. 'Judgment' starts at 120 oz and my gun don't weigh that!

    But I'll not attach an arm brace... just to make sure!
    Gun Zone Deals
     

    rotor

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 1, 2015
    4,239
    96
    Texas
    Just for my curiosity, do you have a holster or do you keep it concealed in a gun bag? I always wondered how people carry these "handguns" openly in a "legal" manner. If you carry openly on a sling in public view isn't that illegal? Just asking for my lack of knowledge.
     

    GeauxLSU

    Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 8, 2022
    141
    46
    San Antonio
    Well a year ago I got an AR-15, APF-15, pistol in .300 BLK. 7 inch barrel and sharkfin brace.

    View attachment 369607

    So the ATF gives this 300 page rule... I notice that if it is 120 oz or more you have to go through some impossible stuff...

    Well I put a regular buffer tube and an off set buis. Added a sling at the back under the tube.

    Shoots very well with 110 gr M1 carbine slugs and 296 powder and it gives over 2100 fps.

    To shoot it one grabs the barrel 'tube' and you thumb pushes forward against the front sight (and you might need a bit of padding on the back of the front sight!)

    You also push forward on the pistol grip so the sling is tight. Cheek is on the buffer tube. Quite steady a hold folks!

    Talking about 50 yard 3 inch groups standing leaning against a post. Good enough for deer inside the woods.

    And get this... I took it apart and weighed all the components, INCLUDING the sling!!

    117 oz!

    Hahahahaha.... it is still a pistol! I don't even have to read all the "If's, and's, or but's" stuff. 'Judgment' starts at 120 oz and my gun don't weigh that!

    But I'll not attach an arm brace... just to make sure!
    Their scale reads 120.1 ounces.

    Bummer for you. Enjoy your time away.
     

    toddnjoyce

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Sep 27, 2017
    19,343
    96
    Boerne
    Still won't matter as the length of pull is far below the 13.5 inches.

    I fear you have an incorrect understanding of the final rule. The weight and LOP criteria as hard and fast numbers went out the window. They are now saying a 7lb pistol is close enough to a 7.5lb rifle that, like horseshoes, hand grenades, and thermonuclear devices, AR pistols can indeed be close enough to a rifle to be a rifle.

    “However, in response to comments pointing out that these lengths and weights were not necessarily dispositive of whether a firearm is intended to be fired from the shoulder, this rule considers the weight and length of a firearm equipped with a “brace” device against the weight and length of similarly designed rifles as a factor that can confirm whether a firearm, which has a rearward attachment that provides surface area for shouldering, is in fact a rifle.”

    See pp 103 thru 105


    However if you feel strongly enough you can defend your interpretation of the final rule, more power to you.
     

    BigRed

    Well-Known
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 25, 2021
    2,229
    96
    Midwest
    I fear you have an incorrect understanding of the final rule. The weight and LOP criteria as hard and fast numbers went out the window. They are now saying a 7lb pistol is close enough to a 7.5lb rifle that, like horseshoes, hand grenades, and thermonuclear devices, AR pistols can indeed be close enough to a rifle to be a rifle.

    “However, in response to comments pointing out that these lengths and weights were not necessarily dispositive of whether a firearm is intended to be fired from the shoulder, this rule considers the weight and length of a firearm equipped with a “brace” device against the weight and length of similarly designed rifles as a factor that can confirm whether a firearm, which has a rearward attachment that provides surface area for shouldering, is in fact a rifle.”

    See pp 103 thru 105


    However if you feel strongly enough you can defend your interpretation of the final rule, more power to you.


    Yep.

    Reminds me of April 19, 1775 when the "king's" men marched into town and demanded the townsfolk present their arms for a weighing.

    Folks got in line to have their rifles approved by the king's men whom he sent out in nice uniforms to do what he would not do himself.

    And then everybody went home and lived in freedom ever after.
     
    Last edited:

    Deaf Smith

    Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 25, 2022
    93
    26
    Texas
    I fear you have an incorrect understanding of the final rule. The weight and LOP criteria as hard and fast numbers went out the window. They are now saying a 7lb pistol is close enough to a 7.5lb rifle that, like horseshoes, hand grenades, and thermonuclear devices, AR pistols can indeed be close enough to a rifle to be a rifle.

    “However, in response to comments pointing out that these lengths and weights were not necessarily dispositive of whether a firearm is intended to be fired from the shoulder, this rule considers the weight and length of a firearm equipped with a “brace” device against the weight and length of similarly designed rifles as a factor that can confirm whether a firearm, which has a rearward attachment that provides surface area for shouldering, is in fact a rifle.”

    See pp 103 thru 105


    However if you feel strongly enough you can defend your interpretation of the final rule, more power to you.
    But mine does not have a brace! So?
     
    Top Bottom