DK Firearms

800,000 infected

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Texas1911

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    May 29, 2017
    10,596
    46
    Austin, TX
    I think they are desperately wanting the body count. I've yet to see significant evidence that this is the deadly neo-Spanish flu that they want it to be.
     

    M. Sage

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 21, 2009
    16,298
    21
    San Antonio
    I think they are desperately wanting the body count. I've yet to see significant evidence that this is the deadly neo-Spanish flu that they want it to be.

    The Spanish flu wouldn't have been a big deal in this day and age, either. Germ theory wasn't even what I'd call "widely accepted" even as late as 1918. IIRC, most of the deaths were due to dehydration because some of the victims couldn't keep anything down. Today, we can train just about anybody to plug a bag of saline into a patient.

    The WHO and other fear-mongers are ignoring the fact that this isn't 1918 in any way, shape or form.
     

    Texas1911

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    May 29, 2017
    10,596
    46
    Austin, TX
    The Spanish flu wouldn't have been a big deal in this day and age, either. Germ theory wasn't even what I'd call "widely accepted" even as late as 1918. IIRC, most of the deaths were due to dehydration because some of the victims couldn't keep anything down. Today, we can train just about anybody to plug a bag of saline into a patient.

    The WHO and other fear-mongers are ignoring the fact that this isn't 1918 in any way, shape or form.

    The 1918 Spanish pandemic only killed 2% of the people it infected in the United States. Today that figure should be easily mitigated to 0.5% ... there are always going to be at-risk people.
     

    M. Sage

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 21, 2009
    16,298
    21
    San Antonio
    The 1918 Spanish pandemic only killed 2% of the people it infected in the United States. Today that figure should be easily mitigated to 0.5% ... there are always going to be at-risk people.

    Of course there are. The thing is that it's such a low percentage of the population, is it worth wetting our pants over? I'd have to go with "no".
     

    DCortez

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 28, 2009
    6,597
    21
    Houston, Cy-Fair
    Of course there are. The thing is that it's such a low percentage of the population, is it worth wetting our pants over? I'd have to go with "no".


    How many people each year die from car wrecks, smoking, drinking (alcohol related), or sticking their tongue in a light socket?


    We would also accept "no"
     

    hkusp1

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 25, 2009
    7,552
    21
    DALLAS, TX
    my wife is a nurse at a children's hospital from what i understood the swine flu is just a slightly hopped up strain of the regular flu thats why it only seriously effects kids and the elderly due to depleted immune systems.
     
    Top Bottom