Right on.There are a lot of things I would in theory support or at least not be against, if I didn't know damn well it wouldn't end there and even if there were universal background checks and licenses to own and all "assault weapons" banned, they'd still moan "can we puhleeeeeese have some reeeeeeeeeaaaaaasonable gun control waaaaah" and act as if anybody could still just go and get a Tommy gun at ACE hardware. With the preliminary end result that you can't even have a potato peeler anymore, like in Englishstan.
So... still: no. not one further step.
SO RIGHT!Yeah, more gun laws is the answer....
Not!
Oh I could care less about a knock on my door or “getting in trouble” with the law. What I couldn’t live with is a gun I provided someone being used negligently or unlawfully to harm an innocent person, especially a child. When I have sold guns to new shooters, I meet them at a range and teach them how to safely handle, shoot, disassemble, clean, reassemble the gun before I turn it over to them. At least then I know they were taught the correct way, what happens after that is on them.
Again...folks can choose to handle transferring their guns the way they see fit and proper as I will continue to do.
Spoken like a true freedom loving Texan...oh wait it sounds more like someone from CA.That’s easy sir, you won’t get my guns then. Wouldn’t want and don’t need someone’s money not willing to provide their name and proof of identification. Haven’t had any problem selling any gun so far, but thanks for your concern.
Again...my guns, my rules.
Just out of curiosity, if/when you sell a gun, you don’t require any ID whatsoever? You just take their “green money” no questions asked eh?
I guess one can choose to be part of the problem or part of the solution.
Nor would anything he says he supports do anything to prevent someone "misusing" a weapon he sold at a later date.Why would you feel bad? You didn’t make them do what they did.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
The ONLY way to enforce universal background checks is to create a federal firearms data base that is kept current. Otherwise national gun registration.Just a simple question. Would/do you support universal background checks?
The ONLY way to enforce universal background checks is to create a federal firearms data base that is kept current. Otherwise national gun registration.
A few well publicized buy/bust arrests between private parties would pretty much make it self-regulating.
So you support big government?
How do you get from me explaining how they can enforce it without registration to asking if I support big government?
I don't read it that way.That is the way I read your post, like you are trying to justify it.
I.That’s easy sir, you won’t get my guns then. Wouldn’t want and don’t need someone’s money not willing to provide their name and proof of identification. Haven’t had any problem selling any gun so far, but thanks for your concern.
Again...my guns, my rules.
Just out of curiosity, if/when you sell a gun, you don’t require any ID whatsoever? You just take their “green money” no questions asked eh?
I guess one can choose to be part of the problem or part of the solution.
Peaches are for cobbler; apples are for pies.Apple. I'm an American, dammit!
Then just how would you propose to use your s/w to "run that person" if you're given a mere fleeting look at the ID and don't have a photographic memory?I agree with you on the ID. I don’t want or need to have a copy of any ID either.
I don't buy them to make money.umm, they only make money if you sell some of them.
The comment he made did NOT imply he supported putting the law in place. He was making a statement of fact.So you support big government?