Lynx Defense

100 yard rimfire

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • jetcycles

    Active Member
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Jul 7, 2009
    578
    76
    Shoreacres, TX
    How does that model stack up against the Savage Mark II FV-SR?

    I don’t own a Tacticool, but do own a Precision Trainer, the only difference being the stocks. I feel that the CZ is slightly more refined, and on average, the CZ tends to be slightly more accurate than the Savage. I do not feel as if the CZ is twice the rifle at twice the money, but I do feel that it has an advantage over the average Savage. I feel that I should clarify that my FVSR wears a Boyd’s laminate stock and upgraded bottom metal, and with that additional cost added into the equation, I feel that the CZ gets the nod from me. My FVSR will easily hold 1MOA with quality ammunition, and I believe that says a lot for a rifle that I have $450 into (minus optics). The Savage is a GREAT value bolt action rim fire rifle, I own a 17HMR variant as well. Sorry, but I have no pictures of the CZ on this phone.

    0b1d3de152d02481655379d038a4a36d.jpg

    01d633787a0de69c5f78078dc91e5c98.jpg



    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     

    AustinN4

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Nov 27, 2013
    9,853
    96
    Austin
    I do not feel as if the CZ is twice the rifle at twice the money,
    Thanks for your reply. To make a head to head comparison I used Bud's cash prices on both and added the Boyd's stock ($137) to the Savage. It came out at $486 for the CZ Tacticool and $371 for the Savage, or a $115 difference.

    I feel that the CZ is slightly more refined, and on average, the CZ tends to be slightly more accurate than the Savage.
    $115 worth more refined and slightly more accurate?
     

    jetcycles

    Active Member
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Jul 7, 2009
    578
    76
    Shoreacres, TX
    Thanks for your reply. To make a head to head comparison I used Bud's cash prices on both and added the Boyd's stock ($137) to the Savage. It came out at $486 for the CZ Tacticool and $371 for the Savage, or a $115 difference.


    $115 worth more refined and slightly more accurate?

    That’s really tough for me to say, as I have a genuine appreciation for both rifles. I can say that I grab the Savage from the safe more often than the CZ, but I think that’s because I’m afraid to beat on the $900 CZ more than the Savage. I also think I grab the Savage more often because I tend to try to get new people behind a rifle as often as possible, and I’d feel better if someone dropped/dinged the Savage than the CZ, if nothing else. I’m not 100% up to snuff on upgrades, but I believe the two rifles are pretty equal when it comes to aftermarket support. Both of my Savages have Apache trigger kits, the CZ will likely get a YoDave upgrade at some point. I would HIGHLY recommend that you consider your future use of the rifle, and consider whether or not you want the option to switch calibers. If so, the extra $120 for the CZ is well worth it in my humble opinion. FWIW, I’m considering investing in a Vudoo action for my next build...the CZ will probably be my new go to loaner when that happens. These are only my opinions, I’m just a pipe liner with a rim fire fetish.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     

    avvidclif

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Aug 30, 2017
    5,794
    96
    Van Zandt County
    Love my Ruger American
    .22LR model 8334
    #ruger #primaryarms #harris #CCI #wiebad View attachment 151374 View attachment 151375 View attachment 151376

    Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

    Also check out NRL.22 !!
    http://nrl22.org

    I have one of those with a Vortex 2-7 scope on it. My 9 yr old grandson loves it. I've never shot it for accuracy but I've watched him @ 100yd wear out silhouette targets, turkey, chicken, and duck. The body shots were too easy so he went to head shots. He would rather shoot it than a 10/22???
     

    HKShooter65

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Ill take that. I am probably going to get a CZ 455 but i would like one with a threaded barrel but they are only offerd with a synthetic stock. I would like one with the wood stock and threaded barrel. Any one know of a model like that??

    I have a suggestion.
    I have 2 Ruger 77/22s
    one LR and one Magnum.
    Both the all weather metal finish and both the lightly stained wood stock.
    https://www.gunsamerica.com/userimages/503/900034247/wm_5257324.jpg
    like that.

    Sadly I don't think in production at the moment. Both are findable at the gun shows with patience.

    Both I had threaded.

    Hard to beat Ruger reliability, accuracy, mag availability etc
     

    jrbfishn

    TGT Addict
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Aug 9, 2013
    28,351
    96
    south of killeen
    Finally got my A22 .22lr to the range to do a propper sight in. Shot Winchester Red box HPs and CCI Minimag HPs. Had a more comfortable setup than the last time I shot it but still not real stable. Not in a hurry this time either.
    I did have a couple fliers that I I knew whete bad when I pulled the trigger. Wind was kind of gusty today. Tried to catch it between gusts but it didn't work well.
    Both are at 100 yards with a bipod and rear bag. Nikon 3-9×40 Prostaff Rimfire scope set at 7x. 50 yard paralax. Would probably do better if I get a better scope for over 50 yards.
    Dammit, trying to get pics and my phone won,'t go to the right ones.
    Sent by an idjit coffeeholic from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
     

    Attachments

    • b1b6e2093a7775614aa25ce7de8b9328.jpg
      b1b6e2093a7775614aa25ce7de8b9328.jpg
      117.7 KB · Views: 286
    • c37ead8e8702c25ce9f6d79a47db0122.jpg
      c37ead8e8702c25ce9f6d79a47db0122.jpg
      55.4 KB · Views: 275
    Last edited:

    jrbfishn

    TGT Addict
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Aug 9, 2013
    28,351
    96
    south of killeen
    Ok, these are the right pics. The one with the circle targets, everything outside the circle was from a previous group. One target is 9 rounds with 2 fliers. The other target had 10 with 2 fliers. I keep losing my breath after the first 5 or 6 rounds. Smoking and coffee don't help.
    6aae6132e2ea412178b54b73d73147f4.jpg
    b72ccf18b8e640e82f699078e0d50cd9.jpg


    Sent by an idjit coffeeholic from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
     

    gshayd

    Ugliest house on the block.
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 25, 2018
    1,307
    96
    Beaumont, Texas
    CZ .22 Rifle would be on my list if accuracy is your priority. MY 10-22s are accurate. My most accurate one is this one It has a barrel I changed out. It has a Houge Stock and a Clark Custom Trigger with metal housing. This is how it groups at 50 yards. I have not tried 100 yards with it.


    10-22CamoprojectMedium_zpse556c7f9.jpg
    housing.
    Ruger Custom 10-22.jpg
     

    91cavgt

    New Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 9, 2010
    21
    11
    The Colony
    I have been working on modifying a Ruger Charger for long range shooting. Replaced a lot of parts from Kidd and Ruger. Got 4"-5" grouping at 100 yards with a cheap Simmons scope on it. It needs better glass before I try it any further.
     

    easy rider

    Summer Slacker
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 10, 2015
    31,520
    96
    Odessa, Tx
    I have been working on modifying a Ruger Charger for long range shooting. Replaced a lot of parts from Kidd and Ruger. Got 4"-5" grouping at 100 yards with a cheap Simmons scope on it. It needs better glass before I try it any further.
    Is the Charger like a 10/22 pistol?
     
    Top Bottom