Military Camp

70 yo Vietnam Vet sentenced to 7+ years for 40 yo MG

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • karlac

    Lately too damn busy to have Gone fishin' ...
    TGT Supporter
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Aug 21, 2013
    11,846
    96
    Houston & Hot Springs
    When a law makes a good person a criminal.

    "... the right of the PEOPLE to KEEP and BEAR arms shall not be infringed."

    The prosecution of this case does exactly that.

    Screw the intervening precedents, the excuses of those who foment them, thereby perverting the Constitution and violating the oath of office they took by doing so ... that's where the f**king crime is in this very incident.

    Saying it's "not that simple" is just another excuse for more of the same, it damn well should be ... we need to take this country back.

    </rant>
    Military Camp
     
    Last edited:

    ZX9RCAM

    Over the Rainbow bridge...
    TGT Supporter
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    May 14, 2008
    59,972
    96
    The Woodlands, Tx.
    If it was purchased while they were married then it was half hers.

    Upon her death it should have become "his" property solely.
    Maybe her family felt different.
     

    easy rider

    Summer Slacker
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 10, 2015
    31,528
    96
    Odessa, Tx
    In any case the story never mentioned trying to sell it, which could have been another charge. Whether or not the law is just isn't the issue, I have serious doubts he didn't know the consequences, and under those consequences he should have been more discreet.
     

    TreyG-20

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 100%
    41   0   0
    Dec 16, 2011
    6,433
    96
    Central
    The guy who owns it went to jail for it, his wife who died didn't own it. Why would his family be trying to sell it?


    (Renegade beat me to it.)
    All speculation at this point since we don't know. Maybe he tried to sell it. Wife just died maybe he needed some funding. Or maybe the family wanted him to sell it and he refused.
     

    Renegade

    SuperOwner
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 5, 2008
    11,771
    96
    Texas
    I am reading on other forums the guy was a world class douchebag, and the only reason he was not ratted out sooner was sympathy for his wife. Once she was gone, it was a race to snitch on him.
     

    benenglish

    Just Another Boomer
    Staff member
    Lifetime Member
    Admin
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Nov 22, 2011
    24,101
    96
    Spring
    Every session, someone introduces a bill in DC to have another 1968-style amnesty. I support the idea, given that there are a few full-autos that were lawfully brought back from WWII (and a few arguably less lawfully brought back from Korea and Vietnam) that are hidden in attics by vets who will never use them for anything illegal. Those WWII vets who didn't trust the 1968 amnesty and hid their guns instead of registering them have demonstrated they're not going to shoot up their towns with those technically illegal firearms. At this point, they really deserve a break.

    The legislation never goes anywhere. I hate that. I really wish another amnesty, run exactly like the one in 1968, would happen.
     

    deemus

    my mama says I'm special
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 100%
    30   0   0
    Feb 1, 2010
    15,727
    96
    DFW
    If it was purchased while they were married then it was half hers.

    Upon her death it should have become "his" property solely.
    Maybe her family felt different.


    Depends on her will.

    EDIT - Renegade beat me to it.
     

    grumper

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 5, 2012
    2,997
    96
    Austin
    Some folks are saying it was the combination of illicit drugs & his 14 guns that got him such a long sentence.

    The weed made him a prohibited person so all of his guns became illegal for him to own. Not just the MG.
     

    V-Tach

    Watching While the Sheep Graze
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Sep 30, 2012
    8,969
    96
    Texas
    That guy is an idiot and is in possession of a stolen M16.

    The amnesty only gave relief to possession of unregistered guns, it did not give relief to theft.

    So he is wrong and the Feds are coming for him?

    Why have the Feds not confiscated the firearm since it was registered?

    ...not being argumentative, but curious

    Thought it interesting a couple of felons own legal machine guns because of the amnesty too...
     
    Top Bottom