Guns International

Only if you don't know Jordan Peterson

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • benenglish

    Just Another Boomer
    Staff member
    Lifetime Member
    Admin
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Nov 22, 2011
    24,058
    96
    Spring
    Here's an interview with a guy that almost everyone knows by now, Dr. Jordan Peterson. Because it's with Dr. Oz and will reach a very wide audience, he covers a wide range of topics without going too deep. It's designed to be and is a great general introduction to his thinking and writing.

    If you've ever watched Peterson, don't bother with this. You've heard it before.

    If you've never heard of the guy, I promise you that this video is totally worth the almost 3 hours it takes to watch it. I dare you not to seek out more from this man after watching this.

    Bias Note - I'm a fan. However, I don't follow his thinking in lock-step. Notice that there are some serious questions that he basically punts. In general, though, he provides solid practical advice on how to live a good life backed up with data-supported principles shown to make life better for you personally, your family, and the world.

    Guns International
     

    diesel1959

    por vida
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 7, 2013
    3,837
    96
    Houston & BFE
    Yep. It's very interesting how much more difficult it is for him in pursuit of what he believes is right considering the viewpoint of Canada on these issues.
     

    benenglish

    Just Another Boomer
    Staff member
    Lifetime Member
    Admin
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Nov 22, 2011
    24,058
    96
    Spring
    Wasn't talking about his mental health, but some of his theories, lol.
    OK, which do you not like?

    I'll start - He can't bring himself to give a straight answer to "Do you believe in God?" I would think that an academic who's spent 40 years thinking deep thoughts would have a canned answer ready to go. He could pick any set of definitions for the words in the question, state them, and answer. He refuses. He always falls back on "I don't know how you define certain words in the question" and then uses that excuse to sidestep the whole question. I think he's afraid to go there and I find that particularly objectionable in light of his constant exhortations to "take responsibility for your life."

    Since I think he doesn't have his act together on that score, I'm completely open to his being wrong or incomplete on other stuff.

    Where do you think he's taken a wrong turn?
     

    Kar98

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Aug 8, 2016
    5,071
    96
    DFW
    I disagree strongly with his pollyanna-esque view on global population explosion, which in his opinion will pose no problems because every person in the world right now is better off on average than 100 years ago.
     

    Younggun

    Certified Jackass
    TGT Supporter
    Local Business Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Jul 31, 2011
    53,727
    96
    hill co.
    OK, which do you not like?

    I'll start - He can't bring himself to give a straight answer to "Do you believe in God?" I would think that an academic who's spent 40 years thinking deep thoughts would have a canned answer ready to go. He could pick any set of definitions for the words in the question, state them, and answer. He refuses. He always falls back on "I don't know how you define certain words in the question" and then uses that excuse to sidestep the whole question. I think he's afraid to go there and I find that particularly objectionable in light of his constant exhortations to "take responsibility for your life."

    Since I think he doesn't have his act together on that score, I'm completely open to his being wrong or incomplete on other stuff.

    Where do you think he's taken a wrong turn?

    I think this has a lot to do with his philosophical views on how things are defined. He generally uses very specific words to say what he wants to say. It’s why in almost every interview the interviewer will make a comment about someone Peterson said and Peterson will interrupt with “I didn’t say that”. I think in his opinion “God” can have a nearly infinite number of definitions and without having it precisely defined he is hesitant to answer. Their is also the possibility that he still struggles with his view on the subject internally. I don’t believe such a struggle conflicts with his message of taking responsibility. But maybe I misunderstood.


    That said, his comments on the Kavanaugh fiasco did bother me. He is adamant about standing up for what is right, not letting yourself be persuaded by lies, etc. Yet on Twitter he said that he felt Kavanaugh should step down from his nomination in order to help bring people together (paraphrased). I have seen him justify this idea when tested against literally everything he has taught and encouraged.

    That said, I’ve spent countless hours watching everything from his classroom lectures, to the breakdown he did on biblical stories, to television and YouTube interviews. I general I find his ideas to be excellent food for thought and appreciate that he often gets down to very nuanced ideas. He often does not give an opinion, but asks questions (in the line of the Socratic method) causing the person asking him questions to consider the subjects themselves. Almost asking the interviewer to form their own conclusion to the question they ask and sometimes at the last minute he will give them his own answer. In a way this is ingenious because he has gotten the person who likely disagrees to provide the justification for the conclusion he (Mr Peterson) has reached.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     

    Kingarthur777

    Active Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 22, 2018
    643
    46
    Livingston
    OK, which do you not like?

    I'll start - He can't bring himself to give a straight answer to "Do you believe in God?" I would think that an academic who's spent 40 years thinking deep thoughts would have a canned answer ready to go. He could pick any set of definitions for the words in the question, state them, and answer. He refuses. He always falls back on "I don't know how you define certain words in the question" and then uses that excuse to sidestep the whole question. I think he's afraid to go there and I find that particularly objectionable in light of his constant exhortations to "take responsibility for your life."

    Since I think he doesn't have his act together on that score, I'm completely open to his being wrong or incomplete on other stuff.

    Where do you think he's taken a wrong turn?

    I think he is avoiding the question because of a fear of bias. Oz follows Islam. I suspect he wouldn't get the airtime with Oz, unless he believed similarly. I don't think he wants his ideas to be tainted by someone who says he's just a Hagi or whatever.
     

    Younggun

    Certified Jackass
    TGT Supporter
    Local Business Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Jul 31, 2011
    53,727
    96
    hill co.
    I think he is avoiding the question because of a fear of bias. Oz follows Islam. I suspect he wouldn't get the airtime with Oz, unless he believed similarly. I don't think he wants his ideas to be tainted by someone who says he's just a Hagi or whatever.

    Islam has god too. Probably not your (I don’t know you) but they definitely reference god.

    Not going to get in to a debate about religion in general though. Only pointing it out as it is pertinent to your hypothesis.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     

    benenglish

    Just Another Boomer
    Staff member
    Lifetime Member
    Admin
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Nov 22, 2011
    24,058
    96
    Spring
    I don’t believe such a struggle conflicts with his message of taking responsibility.
    I feel the same.
    ...his comments on the Kavanaugh fiasco did bother me.
    His tweet bothered me. Twitter isn't the right forum to state an opinion that needs 1000 words to flesh it out. However, I never saw his explanation of his tweet; I heard he did something longer and more nuanced on the subject but I don't know where.
     

    Kar98

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Aug 8, 2016
    5,071
    96
    DFW
    When I'm replying "OK, Cathy" to somebody, for "so you're saying (something I absolutely didn't say, I didn't even say the opposite, I was talking about something completely different)", this is what I'm referring to:



    Full interview:

     

    benenglish

    Just Another Boomer
    Staff member
    Lifetime Member
    Admin
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Nov 22, 2011
    24,058
    96
    Spring
    I disagree strongly with his pollyanna-esque view on global population explosion, which in his opinion will pose no problems because every person in the world right now is better off on average than 100 years ago.
    Aren't those two separate things?

    The "everybody is better off" observation is just a statement of economic fact. Technology + Capitalism = Generally Higher Standard Of Living Everywhere, right?

    Now, the idea that global population isn't a problem is something I've never heard him address. Why does he think it will be no problem? I've heard a number of folks talk about how population growth is leveling for many reasons but I've never heard his take on whether that's good or bad or whatever.
     

    benenglish

    Just Another Boomer
    Staff member
    Lifetime Member
    Admin
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Nov 22, 2011
    24,058
    96
    Spring
    When I'm replying...
    The first video you posted is an edited cut done for comedy purposes.

    But the point of posting those two side by side is still valid.

    The JP interview with Cathy Newman (a hugely influential newsperson in the U.K., for those who don't know) was the second thing that made him famous.
    Good lord... she is nuts
    Yep, but she doesn't realize it.

    Even today both Channel 4, collectively, and Cathy Newman, in particular, seem to feel that the interview went fine. To anyone with a brain, it didn't. In their SJW-addlepatedness, they just don't see it.

    That's sad and disheartening but it really made a lot of people sit up and listen to JP.
     
    Last edited:
    Top Bottom