F35: What the Pilots say.
- Thread starter birddog
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
I agree. Too much input for test pilots who's job is to prove the aircraft's capabilities.
They kind of glossed over losing simulated battles or contests to some other legacy aircraft. Stealth and info only works until you're spotted, then the old fashioned stuff actually matters again. If your job is to engage the enemy, you're gonna get noticed.
They kind of glossed over losing simulated battles or contests to some other legacy aircraft. Stealth and info only works until you're spotted, then the old fashioned stuff actually matters again. If your job is to engage the enemy, you're gonna get noticed.
Don’t take my word for it. Stratford, Rand, Aviation Week, and others, there’s a significant amount of reputable resources with hard data.
One area that airframe shines is advanced passive detection systems. Detecting hostile aircraft at standoff range without the use of radar.
One area that airframe shines is advanced passive detection systems. Detecting hostile aircraft at standoff range without the use of radar.
