Could be they couldn't get it to feed reliably with a double stack.Nothing innovative or new, except no, what's the big draw? At least they could have double stacked the magazine so it didn't have to be so long
It has a stock that today the ATF would measure closed. Does not appear to be 26" long with stock closedWhat am I missing?
It has a stock that today the ATF would measure closed. Does not appear to be 26" long with stock closed
So don't put a vertical grip on it and enjoy a $3k .45 PCCIt has a stock that today the ATF would measure closed. Does not appear to be 26" long with stock closed
See the pic post#2. that one has a stock folded in. its a SBRIt does not have a stock. The OAL is irrelevant
See the pic post#2. that one has a stock folded in
Hate to disagree, but that's a brace.See the pic post#2. that one has a stock folded in
What am I missing?
They didn’t design the mag. It uses Hk UMP magazines.Could be they couldn't get it to feed reliably with a double stack.
Could be the same reason H&K used a single stack.They didn’t design the mag. It uses Hk UMP magazines.
When the brace is folded, what is covered or blocked?