Q: Reverse Search Cell #

Sublime · Jul 21, 2019

toddnjoyce said:
What if he’s a she?

Well perhaps ask wifey how she feels abiut a menage a trois providing the pic sent is attractive

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

skfullgun · Jul 21, 2019

Have you considered it might be someone YOU know that is messing with you by doing this? The question would then be, how did they get HER number? Has anyone had access to either of your phones?

skfullgun · Jul 21, 2019

Sublime said:
Well perhaps ask wifey how she feels abiut a menage a trois providing the pic sent is attractive

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

That's pretty unlikely since this is a serious situation. And it's an insensitive comment.

txinvestigator · Jul 21, 2019

toddnjoyce said:
Pretty sure it’s a burner anyways, but we’re doing some simple ‘self-help’ forensics up front to see how stupid the sender is.

When we get home later today we will be filing a report with Bexar County Sheriff.

If it escalates, we will deal with that then.

Just curious what offense you think it is. Don't know all the details of I could offer some thoughts there...

majormadmax · Jul 21, 2019

https://www.corleylegal.com/violent-crimes/harrassment/

Sublime · Jul 21, 2019

skfullen said:
That's pretty unlikely since this is a serious situation. And it's an insensitive comment.

Just going by what OP posted. Maybe you have harassment, maybe not. Even if it is, not much LE is gonna do about it. Sure report it and keep records but unless there is some overt action, case is gonna be suspended.
Most reverse cell# free services on the net are crap. They are just teasers to pay for services.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

toddnjoyce · Jul 21, 2019

txinvestigator said:
Just curious what offense you think it is. Don't know all the details of I could offer some thoughts there...

Right now I believe there is enough evidence for a PC 42.07 Harassment charge. I don’t believe there is enough to meet the elements of PC 42.072, Stalking.

txinvestigator · Jul 21, 2019

toddnjoyce said:
Right now I believe there is enough evidence for a PC 42.07 Harassment charge. I don’t believe there is enough to meet the elements of PC 42.072, Stalking.

Gotcha. I guess you are looking at this section?

Texad Penal Code

(7) sends repeated electronic communications in a manner reasonably likely to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, embarrass, or offend another.

How many messages has she received? Be sure she does not delete them

Which of the verbs fits your scenario?

ZX9RCAM · Jul 21, 2019

Buy a burner phone and try calling the number?

toddnjoyce · Jul 21, 2019

txinvestigator said:
Gotcha. I guess you are looking at this section?

How many messages has she received? Be sure she does not delete them

Which of the verbs fits your scenario?

Nine so far. Trying to figure out which verb fits ‘Your so damn sexy’, and implying they have routine in-person interactions that will continue anyway, and ‘nobody will know’.

innominate · Jul 21, 2019

LE will probably tell you to send a message saying something like, do not contact me again, if you do I will notify the authorities and make a harassment complaint. It'll be something along those lines. I don't recall the exact wording. They'll tell you what you have to say and tell you that you can not respond to any further messages.

Good luck. These situations suck.

txinvestigator · Jul 21, 2019

innominate said:
LE will probably tell you to send a message saying something like, do not contact me again, if you do I will notify the authorities and make a harassment complaint. It'll be something along those lines. I don't recall the exact wording. They'll tell you what you have to say and tell you that you can not respond to any further messages.

Good luck. These situations suck.

That is certainly not required in the statute

txinvestigator · Jul 21, 2019

txinvestigator said:
That is certainly not required in the statute

After reading the OPs last response, I believe that telling the person to stop will help to establish the harass or annoy sections of the code.

innominate · Jul 21, 2019

txinvestigator said:
That is certainly not required in the statute

It may not be required. I was told it would be to my benefit to handle a simular situation in that manner. Ymmv. Just an overall crappy situation if you're on the receiving end

toddnjoyce · Jul 21, 2019

We’ve contacted Bexar Co Sheriff and expect a follow up within 48 hrs. We’ve been advised to not respond at this time since we haven’t responded so far, which I found to be odd, but it’s what you get on the weekend non-emergency line. They want us to keep every message received, which we can and will do.

We’ve also been asked to call 911 immediately if there’s anything that could qualify as a threat under PC 42.072.

Since my wife is a Department of the Air Force Civilian, we’ve also been advised we can contact AFOSI because the texts indicate the sender has daily interactions with her in the workplace.

Chances are, we won’t find the sender unless they self identify. Practically speaking, this is hasn’t risen to a life safety issue and will probably resolve itself. If it doe rise to a life safety level, it will be a small
minority of incidents like this that do, but the risk increases exponentially.

Darkpriest667 · Jul 21, 2019

toddnjoyce said:
We’ve contacted Bexar Co Sheriff and expect a follow up within 48 hrs. We’ve been advised to not respond at this time since we haven’t responded so far, which I found to be odd, but it’s what you get on the weekend non-emergency line. They want us to keep every message received, which we can and will do.

We’ve also been asked to call 911 immediately if there’s anything that could qualify as a threat under PC 42.072.

Since my wife is a Department of the Air Force Civilian, we’ve also been advised we can contact AFOSI because the texts indicate the sender has daily interactions with her in the workplace.

Chances are, we won’t find the sender unless they self identify. Practically speaking, this is hasn’t risen to a life safety issue and will probably resolve itself. If it doe rise to a life safety level, it will be a small
minority of incidents like this that do, but the risk increases exponentially.

Thanks for the update

Dawico · Jul 21, 2019

Orbie said:
Tell her to respond with, “send a pic”.

He may be ignorant enough to send his face.

This may not produce a picture of a body part you want to see.

Coiled · Jul 21, 2019

Southpaw said:
... the person is smart enough to use a service that provides them with a different number then their actual number supplied by their carrier ...

SP makes a grammar error? Shocking!

ZX9RCAM said:
Buy a burner phone and try calling the number?

Cam is devious, I like it.

Todd, I hope your wife stays safe.

General Zod · Jul 21, 2019

Notifying OSI might be the most effective thing you can do. They've got a much lower threshold for taking action than civilian cops - especially if the texter is a member of the Air Force.

TexasRedneck · Jul 21, 2019

I'm inclined to think it's someone from within her immediate work force. I'd snag one of the office phones and dial the number, all the while watching/listening for anyone that reaches for THEIR phone. Sometimes low-tech works......if it IS someone in her work group, I'd be in the boss' office immediately thereafter - the call can be shown to have been received on their phone WITH a time stamp.

Q: Reverse Search Cell #

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas

Member Benefits:

Active Member

Dances With Snakes

Dances With Snakes

TGT Addict

Úlfhéðnar

Active Member

TGT Addict

TGT Addict

Over the Rainbow bridge...

TGT Addict

Asian Cajun

TGT Addict

TGT Addict

Asian Cajun

TGT Addict

Actually Attends

Uncoiled

TGT Addict

TGT Addict

1911 Nut

Forum statistics