NRA Board Member Has an Opinion on 80% Lowers
- Thread starter Hoji
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
You did read where it said 80% (thus either an 80% receiver or frame). If 80%, by law it is not a firearm; so, how is it that this lowlife libturd Tom King (yes I am a recently relocated NY'er and that is my opinion of that useless Quisling) has stated that 80% parts allow for a prohibited person to buy a gun? THOSE PARTS ARE NOT FIREARMS!!!
That would require work and if they wanted to work they wouldn't be a felon, maybe.
Is he saying that, show me the quote where he says specifically that anyone is buying a gun that was manufactured from 80% parts. What he did say makes no sense especially for a supposed advocate of the RKBA.
Links are ok, though.
https://lmgtfy.com/?q=“"These+'80+p...m,”+Tom+King+of+the+NYSRPA"+site:nysenate.gov
https://lmgtfy.com/?q=“"These+'80+p...m,”+Tom+King+of+the+NYSRPA"+site:nysenate.gov
Yes, but to answer Glenn one need only read carefully as LMGTFY fills in the search box.
Hmm. I tested it and it works fine for me.
In any event, your screenshot answers the question that Glenn B posed.
What was accomplished was answering Glenn B's specific question. He had the link but he wanted you or someone to point out the specific sentence where this King fellow said that bad guys were using 80% lowers to, in effect, buy guns without proper checks.
For some reason you didn't want to point him to the precise spot in the linked article. You never did. So I did it for you. The LMGTFY link included the statement he wanted someone to point out to him.
Yep.
And, as I demonstrated, it's pretty easy to directly answer Glenn B's question without breaking those rules.
I'm still mystified why you weren't willing to do so but, hey, it's your call.
as I have said we are not allowed to quote, and that was what he asked for.
