Interesting article about the study of how words were used, Corpus Linguistics, at the time of the writing of the constitution and 2nd and how that effects the Heller decision and both opinions. Since both opinions mentioned how words were used at the time it's interesting how this tool will be used in the future.
TLDR....
It's not short but concludes that Scalia was more correct than Stevens.
Why they just dont read the founders other writings on the intentions of the 2nd and rest of the bill of rights that says what they meant along with what the compromise in language desired by several states and realise the flashpoint of the revolution was a gun confiscation attempt is beyond me.
https://amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/607186/
TLDR....
It's not short but concludes that Scalia was more correct than Stevens.
Why they just dont read the founders other writings on the intentions of the 2nd and rest of the bill of rights that says what they meant along with what the compromise in language desired by several states and realise the flashpoint of the revolution was a gun confiscation attempt is beyond me.
https://amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/607186/
