Lynx Defense

Soros is in the news again!

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Antares

    Well-Known
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 29, 2015
    1,516
    96
    Seabrook, TX
    Heard in on Hannity that Soros gave 6 million to democraps. Found this story on the internet most have it between 5.5 million and 7 million. He is trying to buy the election again. That's a lot of money from one person I thought they were limited in how much they can give. Oh what am I thinking he is a democrap no limits for them.

    https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/b...ocracy-pac-gave-7000000-between-pro-biden-pac
    Gun Zone Deals
     

    HawkeyeSATX

    Active Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 15, 2014
    580
    76
    Heard in on Hannity that Soros gave 6 million to democraps. Found this story on the internet most have it between 5.5 million and 7 million. He is trying to buy the election again. That's a lot of money from one person I thought they were limited in how much they can give. Oh what am I thinking he is a democrap no limits for them.

    https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/b...ocracy-pac-gave-7000000-between-pro-biden-pac
    Yes, you are limited as to much you can give directly to a candidate.
    The way they get around that by creating what is called a Super PAC. Since there aren't any regulations on Super PAC's, and they are owned by individuals, or several people, all the way up to corporations owning them, then the skies the limit when it comes to donations.
    Always a loop hole somewhere.


    Hawk

    Sent from my motorola one using Tapatalk
     

    Txhillbilly

    Active Member
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Aug 2, 2008
    966
    76
    North Texas
    You reckon every man, woman and child in the US of A is a gun owner. I believe everyone has the right to own/carry except for kids under 4 yrs old.

    I guess I read the report a little wrong. There are approximately 42% of the 118 million households in America that have guns in them. So that would be around 50 million gun owner's. They estimate 393 million guns are owned by citizen's.
     

    HawkeyeSATX

    Active Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 15, 2014
    580
    76
    Don´t forget Mike Bloomberg too.
    He's a staunch anti gun billionaire, except he makes his views public, while having a bodyguard force larger than most PD's, armed with full auto weapons. Why doesn't Bloomberg first start with his goons, and disarm them?!?
    The thing is, what are these billionaires doing that they need the general public to be disarmed?
    They are of the thinking as well, that if there is a nationwide gun ban, that all of the armed criminals will give their illegal firearms as well. Oh yeah, will the mafias, and gang members turn their firearms in too?!?
    You don´t think the Mexican drug cartels wouldn't move their bases of operations to here?
    Just something to think about.

    Hawk

    Sent from my motorola one using Tapatalk
     

    pronstar

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Jul 2, 2017
    10,542
    96
    Dallas
    Gun control is about control.
    They aren’t against guns...they’re against YOU having guns.
    They need a government monopoly on violence.

    Nearly all gun crimes are committed by handguns.

    But they want to go after rifles “for your safety.

    Why?
    Because armed resistance using handguns is a fools errand.

    Rifles give people power, that’s why they want to restrict them.

    Soros and their ilk need to disarm Americans so that the goal of a unified global government can move forward.

    But they can’t move forward until the current system is toppled. And that won’t happen with armed resistance.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
     
    Last edited:

    wiredgeorge

    Older than I was yesterday!
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 10, 2010
    1,785
    96
    Mico TX
    I guess I read the report a little wrong. There are approximately 42% of the 118 million households in America that have guns in them. So that would be around 50 million gun owner's. They estimate 393 million guns are owned by citizen's.

    That looks about right as I don't think many gun owners are one gun folk. I probably have balanced out most all of them that are one gun folks.
     

    wiredgeorge

    Older than I was yesterday!
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 10, 2010
    1,785
    96
    Mico TX
    Gun control is about control.

    Nearly all gun crimes are committed by handguns.

    But they want to go after rifles “for your safety.

    Why?
    Because armed resistance using handguns is a fools errand.

    Rifles give people power, that’s why they want to restrict them.

    Soros and their ilk need to disarm Americans so that the goal of a unified global government can move forward.

    But they can’t move forward until the current system is toppled. And that won’t happen with armed resistance.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

    Bank robbers would probably rob banks with an inexpensive rifle like the Mosin Nagant 91/30 if they could figure out how to stuff one in their pants. 2A is a right afforded us by the Bill of Rights so naturally those that want to dictate over us want to remove that right. It ain't the only right they are going after but the hardest to deal with without getting a bit of resistance. Hence the urge by the left to disarm the public with LAWS, RULES and EXEC ORDERS... etc.
     

    busykngt

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 14, 2011
    4,730
    96
    McKinney
    Because armed resistance using handguns is a fools errand.
    Not quite sure about this statement.

    Handguns have changed world history innumerable times. A Browning Model 1910 [.380ACP] was used to start World War I. U.S. Presidents Lincoln, Garfield and McKinley may also object to that characterization. And “close calls” might be added by Teddy Roosevelt, Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan. [Granted: Kennedy was killed by a rifle; but a fool is a fool whether they use a rifle OR a handgun].

    And too many other examples to list where the judicious use of handguns against political leaders have potentially changed the course of world history. Here in the U.S., RFK and Huey Long comes to mind. And the world stage is filled with examples of handguns changing history too; King Faisal of Saudi Arabia (1975) and Yitzhak Rabin of Israel (1995). Personally, I’m not so dismissive of handguns serving as a manifestation of “armed resistance”.
     

    oldag

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Feb 19, 2015
    17,430
    96
    It’s one reason why I keep buying guns. Anyone who’s a father owes it to his children to have barrels/crates buried somewhere.
    And think long term. What if parts aren't available?

    Sooner or later, a part is going to break (again, thinking long term). Having multiples of the same gun provides you with an unbroken part that corresponds to the broken part. With this, you can always take dimensions and machine a replacement part if such can't be purchased. Plus, also stockpile some high wear parts.
     

    Sam7sf

    TGT Addict
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    Apr 13, 2018
    12,466
    96
    Texas
    And think long term. What if parts aren't available?

    Sooner or later, a part is going to break (again, thinking long term). Having multiples of the same gun provides you with an unbroken part that corresponds to the broken part. With this, you can always take dimensions and machine a replacement part if such can't be purchased. Plus, also stockpile some high wear parts.
    Good point. A quality firearm should still have some basic parts such as springs, extractor and the tooling needed.

    I have a little locker I keep my gun tools in, fasteners, parts I have extra of.
     

    pronstar

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Jul 2, 2017
    10,542
    96
    Dallas
    Not quite sure about this statement.

    Handguns have changed world history innumerable times. A Browning Model 1910 [.380ACP] was used to start World War I. U.S. Presidents Lincoln, Garfield and McKinley may also object to that characterization. And “close calls” might be added by Teddy Roosevelt, Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan. [Granted: Kennedy was killed by a rifle; but a fool is a fool whether they use a rifle OR a handgun].

    And too many other examples to list where the judicious use of handguns against political leaders have potentially changed the course of world history. Here in the U.S., RFK and Huey Long comes to mind. And the world stage is filled with examples of handguns changing history too; King Faisal of Saudi Arabia (1975) and Yitzhak Rabin of Israel (1995). Personally, I’m not so dismissive of handguns serving as a manifestation of “armed resistance”.

    I don’t disagree with the examples you posted.
    But I also wouldn’t characterize changing history as armed resistance per se.

    Put another way:
    Had the Afghanistan or Iraqis been armed with handguns, no rifles, then the wars we’ve been waging would have gone quite a bit differently in our favor, methinks.






    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
     

    busykngt

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 14, 2011
    4,730
    96
    McKinney
    Yeah, undoubtedly - no argument from me, there.

    And your basic premise that it’s about “control” is spot on the mark (as far as I’m concerned). That is their objective!

    Just was pointing out that gun control concerning rifles (“scary black rifles”) isn’t going to solve anything. As long as assassins are ready to “die for their cause”, there are a multitude of ways to accomplish their ends. The Liberals continue to believe you can legislate evil out of existence. Not sure how or why they believe that to be true.
     
    Top Bottom