Yes..mandate plate carriersShould probably make Kevlar compulsory.
See this is why we can't beat stupid. They wear you out with it, drag you down to their level and beat you with experience. Its relentless, .....
It seems whenever there is a report of a shooting, the first question that come up is “where/how did this prey get a gun?” The better question would be, “Why was this person in a place in life they felt this was the right choice?” Focus on the person, not the weapon used.
Good points all. But I was referring to and should have said “mass shooting”, when the targets are random.WOW. "Shooting" is a very loose term. There are all kinds of "shootings" There is the intentional murder because I want to, kind. There is the accidental kind, there is the flash anger kind. There is the criminal who uses a gun because they do that in their line of work kind. SO to just lump all "shooting" together is not a valid premise. What makes you think that someone felt this was the right choice? What presumption that they thought before they did this?
The use of a firearm follows many different paths and logic, or lack of logic. Legal use vs illegible use. There is no simplistic answer or analysis to "Shooting". Each is a case by case gather the facts and evaluate situation.
. . . San Francisco even said the other day they would not release mugshots in order to stop fueling the rhetoric about crime among minorities.
That will take some of the fat off of their fat asses.Yes..mandate plate carriers
When police kill someone, the police are blamed. When a crim kills someone, they blame the gun.
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
I cribbed it from somewhere else. It's paraphrased but alas, not mine.I'm going to plaigerize this. Or plagerize? however it's spelled. Great, succinct, awesome statement.