22 lr advice

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • mpolk

    Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 3, 2009
    112
    1
    Waco, Texas
    Thinking about getting a 22 lr pistol to practice with along with my new 9mm FNP 9. Looking at the Sig Mosquito because it is very similar to the FN. I am very new to handguns and was wondering if this is a good move or not.
     

    mcss383

    New Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 5, 2009
    22
    1
    Highlands, TX
    I have shot probably close to 7k rds, if not more, through my Browning Buckmark and have never had problems with it. It is extremely accurate to boot!

    It would be my suggestion if there isn't a 22LR conversion for you FNP 9.
     

    brickboy240

    Active Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 19, 2008
    238
    1
    Houston, TX, USA
    After 10 years of ownership and heavy shooting...I am a big fan of the Ruger 22-45. Mine is accurate, reliable and has not given me a lick of trouble.

    If you shoot 1911s, XDs, Hi-Powers or SIGs...the feel of the 22-45's grip makes more sense than the Buckmark or other 22 pistols.

    I vote Ruger 22-45.

    - brickboy240

    PS: another really nice 22 pistol is the Ruger Single Six. My brother bought his when I bought the 22-45 and if you want a revolver in 22lr...the Single Six is a really nice shooter.
     

    Nodena Ranger

    New Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 8, 2009
    40
    1
    Downtown Nodena-NE Texas
    I am not particularly fond of Ruger pistols in general (with exception of the single six) but have owned a MK III Hunter for three years. Have shot many, many CCI hollow points through it with not one problem. A little difficult to get accustomed to the V rear site and the fiber front site but once you do, it's easy to throw down on a cottonmouth and dispatch it. I would not consider it a bulls eye target pistol, however one can change the sites with ease. Great, beautiful pistol...Ruger hit it outa' the park on this one. You won't be disappointed.
     

    jimmy-buffett

    New Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 22, 2008
    41
    1
    I am a big fan of the Browning Buckmark. The barrel is heavy which helps with stability, and there is not a lot of weight/mass that has to move to kick the rounds out. Plus there are a lot of mods for the gun. Mine has been wonderfully reliable and will eat pretty much any ammo you throw at it (I've been putting a lot of subsonic through mine lately).

    Here's mine, with top rail, dot optic and .22 suppressor:

    http://img211.imageshack.us/img211/223/dsc00548jn2.jpg
     

    PopsXD9sc

    Active Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 16, 2008
    571
    1
    Longview
    Reviews on the Mosquito are almost always bad. I must have bought one of the better ones. Loved the style and feel of the gun and for the most part it ran well. 400 rds of CCI mini-mags was about what it took to break in quite well. Ran Federal bulk (about 1500 rds) with no issues other than the occasional fail to fire. My issue with the gun was the cheap sights and there are no replacements available since the front is staked onto the slide. Since I couldn't see it too well I traded for a new Buckmark and couldn't be happier. Only issue with Buckmark is that it doesn't like Remington Golden Bullets. Other than that it is a great gun; very accurate and no issues with operation. Added a red dot and TacSol integral rail and it's even more fun.
     

    Patrón

    Active Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Feb 28, 2008
    291
    1
    San Antonio
    I'd consider the Sig Mosquito, go to a shop and look and feel them in your hand.
     
    Top Bottom