Target Sports

8 US Troops Die in Heavy Afghan Combat - US Abandoning Border Regions

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Jeff B

    Active Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 28, 2008
    337
    1
    Flower Mound, TX
    This article is about a co-ordinated attack on US Outposts in Kamdesh, a border area in the remote Province of Nuristan. If you read down into the article, it discusses recently announced plans to abandon Nuristan in favor of protecting the population centers. My question (not really a question) is, how can we make plans to defend the "population centers" is we abandon the border areas and allow our enemies free and unfettered use of the passes to Pakistan?

    As the wars have ground on, the doctrine of allowing the military to fight the wars have disintegrated. Rules of engagement that effectively shackle our troops and firepower, decisions to abandon years of struggle and numerous casualties made in the shadows, like the decisions to abandon the borders. Have you seen that in the news? A Commander makes a statement about his request for forces and is summoned to a "conference (and photo op)" on Air Force One and the National Security Advisor makes statements about the Commander not "having a full appreciation for the theater strategy".

    What a bunch of BS. What about Obama's statements about re-inforcing Afghanistan and "winning"? More politically expedient throw away lines made because at the time Iraq was a desperate situation in the process of imploding and Afghanistan appeared to be a sure thing.

    Jeff B.

    8 US Troops Die in Heavy Afghan Combat
    October 05, 2009
    Long War Journal|by Bill Roggio


    Satellite

    U.S. and Afghan forces beat back a brazen assault on two joint outposts in the eastern Afghan province of Nuristan. The attack was led by Taliban commander Dost Mohammed and was aided by al Qaeda's Shadow Army. Eight U.S. troops, seven Afghan troops, and an unspecified number of enemy fighters were killed during the fighting, which ended after U.S. air and artillery pounded the fighters in a counterattack.
    The U.S. military said the fighters launched the attack on the two remote outposts in the district of Kamdish, just 10 miles from the Pakistani border, after organizing at a nearby mosque and a village. More than 300 fighters were involved in the assault, according to Quqnoos, an Afghan newspaper.
    The fighting was said to be intense and lasted for several hours. It ended after U.S. attack helicopters, strike fighters, and artillery pounded the insurgent assault teams. Eight U.S. and seven Afghan security personnel have been reported killed, and the district police chief and 13 policemen were captured. The U.S. military did not provide an estimate of enemy killed, but said U.S. and Afghan forces “inflicted heavy enemy casualties” during the counterattack.
    A 'complex attack'
    The U.S. military said the attack was “complex,” meaning it was well organized and executed. The fighters used assault rifles, heavy machine guns, rocket-propelled grenades, and heavy weapons such as rockets and mortars. The attack was coordinated and the fighters were able to withdraw from the battlefield in an organized fashion while under heavy fire. According to one report, the bodies of only five enemy fighters were found in the aftermath of the attack.
    "This was a complex attack in a difficult area,” said Colonel Randy George, the commander of Task Force Mountain Warrior.
    The U.S. military described the attackers as “Nuristani tribal militia” and said that “the sources of the conflict in the area involve complex tribal, religious and economic dynamics.” Afghan officials described the attackers as Taliban, Uzbek, and Arab fighters who crossed into Afghanistan from Pakistan.
    Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said the Taliban was behind the attack; he also said the fate of the captured policemen has yet to be determined.
    The attack took place as the U.S. military has stated it was prepared to withdraw from the Nuristan region.
    “Coalition forces' previously announced plans to depart the area as part of a broader realignment to protect larger population centers remain unchanged,” the U.S. military said in the press release on the attack.
    Several U.S. analysts and think tanks have advocated withdrawing from rural regions in eastern Afghanistan.
    Al Qaeda’s Shadow Army played a role in the attack
    While the U.S. military has portrayed today’s Nuristan assault as being conducted by local “Nuristani tribal militia,” U.S. military and intelligence officials contacted by The Long War Journal said al Qaeda’s paramilitary Shadow Army participated in the attack.
    The attack was launched by Taliban leader Dost Mohammed, a senior U.S. military intelligence official who specializes in the situation along the Afghan-Pakistani border told The Long War Journal. The official said that elements from the Shadow Army “stiffened” Dost’s forces, which are considered able and effective fighters in their own right.
    Dost is the Taliban’s shadow governor of Nuristan province, who has close links to al Qaeda and the Pakistani Taliban just across the border. “He’s an operator, a big, big commander for Nuristan, and has lots of resources,” a U.S. expert who advises the U.S. government on the Taliban told The Long War Journal.
    Dost has occasionally run afoul of the decisions made by the Taliban’s executive council, or the Shura Majlis, over leadership decisions in the region.
    “In 2007, Dost Mohammed was against the Quetta Shura appointment of Maulvi Abdul Kabir, a Zadran Pashtun Taliban leader with strong links to Omar, as the Taliban's Eastern Zone Commander,” the U.S. expert, who wished to remain anonymous, said. “Dost has always enjoyed semi-autonomy control over his area of operations and his own resources in Nuristan.”
    Dost’s forces and the Shadow Army conducted a somewhat similar attack in July 2008 in the village of Wanat in Nuristan. A force estimated at between 200 to 400 fighters assaulted a small outpost as it was being built. The daylong firefight pitted the 48 U.S. and 24 Afghan troops against the large Taliban and al Qaeda force. Nine U.S. Soldiers and between 20 to 50 enemy fighters were killed during the fierce battle, in which the assault force briefly entered the outer perimeter of the compound before being repelled.

    This is where the attacks took place:

    Forward Operating Base Keating
    Forward Operating Base Keating is located in the Nuristan Province of Easern Afghanistan, about 15 miles from the Pakistani border. As of March, 2008 it was a small outpost home to Bravo Troop, 1st Squadron, 91st Cavalry Regiment, 173rd Airborne Brigade Combat Team.

    FOB Keating and the 1-91 also oversaw Combat Outpost (called COP's) Warheit, a satellite outpost of Keating that is about a three and a half hour hike up the mountain. Small outposts like Warheit are usually home to one or two platoons of soldiers from the ANA and U.S. Military and are usually set up in very remote areas to watch for any increases in Taliban activity.

    In the vicinity of FOB Keating and COP Warheit Bravo Company and the ANA were also attempting to keep the peace between the villages of Nagar, Papristan, Jimjuz, Binuz, upper and lower Kamidesh. Those villages had been fighting amongst each other long before coalition forces entered the area.

    This is who the FOB is named for:
    Army 1st Lt. Benjamin D. Keating

    27, of Shapleigh, Maine; assigned to the 3rd Squadron, 71st Cavalry Regiment (Reconnaissance, Surveillance, Target Acquisition), 3rd Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division, Fort Drum, N.Y.; died Nov. 26 of injuries sustained when his vehicle turned over in Kamdesh, Afghanistan
    Guns International
     

    2Shots1Wound

    Active Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 1, 2009
    256
    1
    This administration doesn't have the stomach for conflict. They see any assertive foreign policy or war as an albatross around their neck. The media is already asking questions like

    "Can America live with an Iranian Nuke"?

    A pre-cursor to more militray contraction and lost ground. But hey kids, a least we have a slew of welfare entitlements on the horizon to keep us happy right????
     

    biglucky

    Well-Known
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Feb 3, 2009
    1,292
    31
    Dripping Springs, TX
    One of my good friends just got back from a year at Camp Keating a couple months ago.. Those guys are the real deal true American hero's. They are the tip of the spear basically living in a full time combat zone. God bless and protect them..
     

    MadMo44Mag

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 23, 2009
    3,053
    21
    Ft.Worth
    My son heads over there in a few months so all this makes me a little nervous to say the lest and the Obamanation is such an idiot.
     

    Texas1911

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    May 29, 2017
    10,596
    46
    Austin, TX
    This will turn into a UN police action soon enough. They are trying to de-escalate the region so that the UN will take a bigger role. Obama probably thinks he can talk everyone into it, that way he can pull out a large amount of the US forces to appease everyone.

    This is a political crap fest that is quickly turning into Vietnam v2.0, and I'm referring to Washington turning to politics, and not letting the military do it's job properly. No one ever learns anything.
     

    MadMo44Mag

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 23, 2009
    3,053
    21
    Ft.Worth
    T
    This is a political crap fest that is quickly turning into Vietnam v2.0, and I'm referring to Washington turning to politics, and not letting the military do it's job properly. No one ever learns anything.

    If the politicians would give the generals 30 days to do what they want too, we would be done over there!
     

    DirtyD

    Well-Known
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 20, 2008
    1,627
    31
    Spring
    90 days of free reign (or in the case of arty and CAS free rain) would make all the difference.....
     

    M. Sage

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 21, 2009
    16,298
    21
    San Antonio
    This administration doesn't have the stomach for conflict.

    Neither did the last one. Or the one before that. Or the one before that... and on back to Vietnam, excepting maybe Reagan, who we never really got to find out about on that front.

    The problem is that we're falling into the same trap as we did in Vietnam. We want to win, just "not by too much". We're afraid it'll fire up a wider regional conflict.

    Excuse my French, but there are two words that I must use to sum up my opinion on the matter: **** that! These ass clowns need to read up on their military strategy starting with Sun Tzu and Carl von Clausewitz. Both of these historical military geniuses agree with each other: once war is begun, civilians (including the government) need to STFU and give the commander on the ground what he needs when he needs it.

    It's idiotic to enter into a fight after tying one of your hands to your own belt. You cannot enter a fight with anything less than the will to slug it out to the bloody end and win by dominating the enemy and crushing him mercilessly. I'm having a flashback to the first Bush, when we slaughtered those routed Iraqis troops as they fled North out of Kuwait... and the press and a bunch of hippie assholes went nuts over the carnage. Tough! You know what you call heaps of enemy dead like that? Winning!!! That's how it's done, and if you don't have the stomach for it, don't look! Turn your head, plug your ears and sing a happy tune to yourself until it's over, but don't you dare second-guess the commanders on the ground when they want to push the advantage and wipe out the remainder so that you don't have to worry about them ten years from now.

    If I were to somehow step into the Oval Office tomorrow as the lawful President, my first military order of business would be more troops, relaxed ROE and getting the SF Teams back into doing proper Green Beret work. My second order of military business would be to sit down with McChrystal and decide on a city that was very much a hotbed of Taliban activity, one that would make an excellent example... then decide whether to send scads of B-52s loaded with conventional weapons to wipe it from the face of the earth (and then some) or just tacnuke the bastards... or both!

    We need to renew our commitment to winning the fight we're engaged in, and we need to show the enemy that we're committed 100%... Unfortunately, our "leaders" in Washington aren't committed even 10%. They're more comfortable with playing with our troops' lives to further themselves politically.

    I really wish people would read the classics... It's the difference between the blackest ignorance and real enlightenment.
     

    M. Sage

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 21, 2009
    16,298
    21
    San Antonio
    It happens. Our "allies" over there are spinless little schmucks.

    You think that someone who forces his woman to dress like that just to go out in public is anything resembling a man?
     

    Texas1911

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    May 29, 2017
    10,596
    46
    Austin, TX
    90 days of free reign (or in the case of arty and CAS free rain) would make all the difference.....

    We aren't fighting a state, everything is splinter celled out. It's not something you are going to fix by raining bombs. It worked in WWI, WWII, Vietnam, etc. because we were fighting a state, and even in Vietnam bombing the Ho Chi Minh Trail didn't do much good. Now we are fighting a guerrilla war specifically, and targeting civilian targets might have some positives, but it will bring as many negatives as well.
     

    frijolero817

    Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 17, 2009
    161
    1
    Fort Worth
    If all tactics were made available regardless of treaties or code of conduct we could anihilate all of our current opponents in 90 days. We are the best but we don't reach our potential in anything anymore.
     

    Deuce Coupe

    Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Aug 29, 2009
    72
    1
    Livingston
    I may be naive but it would seem that a whole lot of bombs out of a whole lot of airplanes might soften up the Taliban.

    Oh, I forgot, it all the new fighter jets and skilled Taliban pilots that would mount a significant resistance. I guess it won’t work.

    Its time to either kick their A$$ or get out.
     

    cuate

    Well-Known
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 27, 2009
    1,842
    21
    Comanche Co., Texas
    I wish that big eared obomination was out in front of the American Troops fighting in Afghanistan with a saber in his hand, head turned back and shouting, "Come on Men, lets go get 'em"...but obama never having even experienced a cub scout troop, our brave young men are up salt creek without a paddle as far as the intelligence, leadership,
    and experience of a Commander in Chief who is of no character, real morals, or smarts other than plotting the socialism of our Nation!!!!!
     

    Texas1911

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    May 29, 2017
    10,596
    46
    Austin, TX
    Yea but would we know where to direct that at? They don't mass their forces very frequently do they?

    Exactly, the entire US military is designed for a European battle ground ever since the start of WWI. It's been adapted to fight other types of wars, but we've never really excelled at it, mostly because it's been on foreign battlegrounds. Hence the adaptation of the OSS in WWII, the formulation of the modern SF team in Vietnam as well as the Navy SEALs. Those are our versions of a splinter cell, small, highly trained units that go behind enemy lines to create havoc and train locals to fight against our enemies.

    Look what we did to the Iraqi Army in the first Gulf War. If it was above or below ground it was vaporized as fast as we could see it. We are the absolute best at destroying things, but only if we can find them.

    That is the problem with a guerrilla war with splinter celled structure. There is nothing for the big strong military to take a heavy swing at. We instead have to switch to baiting them and seek-and-destroy like we did in Vietnam with the VC. The VC made a huge blunder in the Tet Offensive by organizing into a large militia force that could be easily seen. They then got their ass handed to them by our military.

    Moral is ... you can fly B52s loaded with all kinds of ordinance all damn day until you are blue in the face, but you won't win that kind of war. Put enough troops on the ground that there is no where to hide and you'll make significant progress. Hinder that ability and you are playing cat and mouse for years and years like we have been ever since.

    I wish we could point to a spot on the planet and say ... there they are, and rain so much firepower on them that it blocked out the sun for weeks and killed off everything above a single celled organism. I would film it and mail it to Iran as prophecy.
     

    2Shots1Wound

    Active Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 1, 2009
    256
    1
    Moral is ... you can fly B52s loaded with all kinds of ordinance all damn day until you are blue in the face, but you won't win that kind of war. Put enough troops on the ground that there is no where to hide and you'll make significant progress. Hinder that ability and you are playing cat and mouse for years and years like we have been ever since..

    Short story long,

    I watched Michael Moore tonight ridicule and minimize the notion that terrorist are not a real threat to the US. Any attempt to portray them as such is merely political posturing of some sort. Never mind the obvious success that these groups enjoyed throughout the last few decades.

    Terrorism\Asymetric warfare = cutting edge, low cost thorn-in-side strategy against Democratically run open societies. Very effective (Spain)
    and as you pointed out, A HUGE F*CKING PROBLEM! I know that I'm rambling a bit but consider the cultural strength and certainty of islam vs the self absorbed & insecure Western mindset. It just pisses me off to no end. I suspect that I'm preaching to the choir....
     
    Top Bottom