Anyone a fan of fixed power scopes?

[phatcyclist]

I'm looking to replace the aging Tasco 4x on my .308 with something that has a bit more power. I've looked at the Super Sniper scopes and while I like them a good bit, I do not want exposed adjustments. I know Leupold offers some fixed power stuff, along with Weaver. Weaver sells a very reasonable 6x, although I'm not sure I wouldn't like a little more power. Their 8x is almost double the cost for some reason, but I would probably keep it for a decade or more so it might be worth it in the long run.

Any ideas? I like the flexibility of an adjustible power scope, but all the extra pieces inside worry me. I'm not looking to break the bank so I know that limits my options.

 

[codygjohnson]

I've seen a few guys shooting with a Millet 10x at matches before. It's a relatively respectable scope and they are under $300 if I remember correctly. It’s been a couple of years since I’m been to a long range match and Millet has since changed owners or company structure or something so I don’t know if they are still the same quality as they were, but I’m sure you could find some reviews online.

 

[Texas1911]

The more adjustments, the more variable, the more the likelihood of failure or zero bump due to recoil, flexure, etc.

A fixed 10x scope is ideal for just about anything. The only argument is a field of view whilst hunting or shooting close range, but I don't find that prohibitively problematic.

 

[deputy]

i am far removed from a benchrest target shooter..........

Tremors from high magnification drive me nuts field shooting. I like lower power for a larger field of view and better light gathering capability in the deer pasture.
My rifles wear 4x and 2x7.

 

[navyguy]

Fixed will always be more clear and less subject to moving off of zero. And the power depends on the ranges you will shoot. Out to 100 yards, a 6x will do fine on a .308. You won't see flees on a dear, but you should be able to hit a kill zone pretty well. The higher power scopes will be less effective at shorter ranges. Your field of view is much reduced. So it's a trade off.

 

[Texas1911]

i am far removed from a benchrest target shooter..........

Tremors from high magnification drive me nuts field shooting. I like lower power for a larger field of view and better light gathering capability in the deer pasture.
My rifles wear 4x and 2x7.

LOL, yeah a 20x+ scope will show you your heart rate through the scope. Drink any caffeine or shoot something with some recoil and it'll look like you are dancing.

 

[dee]

I have a 4x on my FN which I hunt deer with and love it, but on my varment long shot rifles there are high power variable scopes.

 

[phatcyclist]

The little 4x does it's job just fine, but I think a move to 6 or 8 would be great. I'll give Millet scopes a look, I really haven't heard much of anything about them other than knowing their existence.

 

[Texas1911]

So ... how you like that Redfield?

 

[phatcyclist]

It's nice to look at, I haven't done much but mount it and bore-sight it.

 

[Big country]

I have a Leupold 7 power on my 30-06. it'll do 300 and 100 the bulls-eye is frigging huge at 50. LOL. But I doubt I'll change it anytime soon. But if I do it will only be to a 3x9x40.

 

[Lastshot]

The 3-9 power scope is the most common power scope for deer hunting. Most will leave the scope at the 3x power though for FOV.

 

[dobarker]

If you can find one in good condition, Lyman All American is an amazing fixed power scope. I've got a 6x mounted on a .240 wby mag. that has been there since the 70's and still holds true and is as clear as a polished bell.