No it wasn’t. The rest of what was said was important. You said it was illogical because you took it out of context.I read it, it was just filler. It was assumptions.
Yes it makes perfect sense. You may be familiar with 1911s but you don’t seem to understand statistics. When we are discussing reliability between manufacturers that is a math equation. there is a numerator and a denominator. You have a numerator, but not a denominator. You don’t even understand that you need the denominator. There is nothing wrong with that. The people who perform repairs tend to not be the people who are in charge of tracking QC. They are entirely different skill sets. The number of 1911s you have worked on is good for saying the number of 1911s you have worked on, but the information you have provided does not indicate overall product reliability in any way.That doesn't make any sense. I'm familiar with 1911's, I've owned a few and have handled *many* more. I know how a reliable 1911 looks. I know when a 1911 isn't working, how to figure out if it needs lube or a gunsmith.
I don't need to own a pistol to know if something is wrong with it.
n+1Just how many iterations of perfection does it take to get to perefection?
I understand statistics well enough.Yes it makes perfect sense. You may be familiar with 1911s but you don’t seem to understand statistics. When we are discussing reliability between manufacturers that is a math equation. there is a numerator and a denominator. You have a numerator, but not a denominator. You don’t even understand that you need the denominator. There is nothing wrong with that. The people who perform repairs tend to not be the people who are in charge of tracking QC. They are entirely different skill sets. The number of 1911s you have worked on is good for saying the number of 1911s you have worked on, but the information you have provided does not indicate overall product reliability in any way.
I'm definitely considering it.
but you don’t understand statistics well enough to realize that the most popular manufacturer accounting for the majority of malfunctions is meaningless unless you can show that the malfunctions are disproportionately high.I understand statistics well enough.
I also live in the real world and know that the MFG won't tell me a thing, and i as a consumer will have to make a decision based off of the limited amount of information available to me.
My information tells me this; while Kimber may make the majority of 1911's on the market, they constitute the vast majority of malfunctions. And the amount of kimbers i see that fail to function vastly eclipses any combination of other manufacturers, from glock, sig, Beretta, colt, hk, walther, s&w.
I am getting tired of saying this, my info isn't perfect, but unlike you I've provided it. All you've done is complain about it's legitimacy while providing no alternative.
I really am starting to think you work for kimber