Carry across state lines rejected

Discussion in 'Gun Legislation' started by erndog105, Jul 22, 2009.

  1. erndog105

    erndog105 New Member

    9
    0
    1
    Oct 28, 2008
    I am confused, why was the rejected bill needed since reciprocity laws allow me to carry from one state to another, doesn't it? What did the rejected ammendment provide that is not already available? What am I missing?
     


  2. DirtyD

    DirtyD Well-Known

    1,627
    0
    36
    Sep 20, 2008
    Spring
    It was to force states to recognize a CHL from another state. As of right now it is a deal between Governors and AG's. In other words you could use your CHL to carry in any state that issued CHL's.
     
  3. GM.Chief

    GM.Chief Well-Known

    1,451
    0
    36
    Mar 16, 2009
    The rejected bill would've made it legal to carry in any state that has ccw laws. Therefore, you would be able to carry in states like OR and CA where you currently cannot due to no reciprocity
     
  4. erndog105

    erndog105 New Member

    9
    0
    1
    Oct 28, 2008
    Thanks everyone, GM, we are all learning and I appreciate you response.
     

Share This Page