. . . . . .The term in question is "bear"....and to what point the "security" of others is compromised by one's right to bear arms. . . . .
Correct me if I'm wrong, I don't believe that we have a right to "security" that is somehow connected with the right to bear arms.
IMO, this could mean that the people could be disarmed in the name of "securing" them. (they really need a smiley face with a tin foil hat).