Concealed carry at Austin's Park and Pizza?

[Fosty 2.0]

Does anyone know if it's allowes?

 

[TxStetson]

If you’re good at concealing, does it matter?

 

[BillFairbanks]

Does anyone know if it's allowes?

Download the Texas 3006 App


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Fosty 2.0]

Download the Texas 3006 App


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's not on there

 

[Mowingmaniac 24/7]

Doesn't mean it's not posted 30.06.

Perhaps, give em a call ask for the manager, listen to what he/she has to say.

Can't/won't supply the answer, consider going elsewhere.

 

[Kar98]

Nothing listed here:

https://austinspark.com/rules-requirements/

Nothing listed here:

https://www.texas3006.com/view.php?...address=&city=pflugerville&restriction_type=+

No signs at the front entrance as of March 2019:

You should be good.

 

[Fosty 2.0]

Nothing listed here:

https://austinspark.com/rules-requirements/

Nothing listed here:

https://www.texas3006.com/view.php?...address=&city=pflugerville&restriction_type=+

No signs at the front entrance as of March 2019:

View attachment 174716

You should be good.

Thanks man.

 

[txinvestigator]

If you’re good at concealing, does it matter?

Yes

If legal it isn't a crime, if illegal it is a crime. Pretty simple to me

 

[BillFairbanks]

Yep, follow the law, just like Suzanna Hupp did. What's the worst that can happen?

 

[txinvestigator]

Yep, follow the law, just like Suzanna Hupp did. What's the worst that can happen?

The law now allows you to carry. Don't go to places where it is unlawful to carry.

Telling people to ignore the law and commit a crime is irresponsible.

 

[BillFairbanks]

The law now allows you to carry. Don't go to places where it is unlawful to carry.

Telling people to ignore the law and commit a crime is irresponsible.

I agree

I just hate laws that prevent people from defending themselves.

I don’t do business with companies that post 30.06 signs.

However, if one has to choose between a small fine and being unable to defend themselves, I’m not going to begrudge them for making a logical choice.

There are so many laws on the books, I’m sure most of us break the law on a regular basis without even knowing it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[ZX9RCAM]

The logical choice would be to not go there if it wasn't required.

 

[txinvestigator]

I agree

I just hate laws that prevent people from defending themselves.

I don’t do business with companies that post 30.06 signs.

However, if one has to choose between a small fine and being unable to defend themselves, I’m not going to begrudge them for making a logical choice.

There are so many laws on the books, I’m sure most of us break the law on a regular basis without even knowing it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

First, no law prevents anyone from defending him/herself. It can restrict the tool or weapon, but not from self-defense.
Again, unless it's a place you HAVE to go, then choose not to go if it restricts carry

 

[Renegade]

If you’re good at concealing, does it matter?

It does if you do not like to give your money to anti-gunners.

 

[Renegade]

Yep, follow the law, just like Suzanna Hupp did. What's the worst that can happen?

She did not follow the law, she ignored it. Many legal ways to carry a firearm, she ignored them all.

 

[Bithabus]

If a business puts up a valid 30.06 sign they are telling you that in their mind your safety and the safety of your family is worth nothing. Why would you want to give your money to people like that?

 

[Renegade]

If a business puts up a valid 30.06 sign they are telling you that in their mind your safety and the safety of your family is worth nothing. Why would you want to give your money to people like that?

They are also saying they fear YOU and your concealed gun more than they fear an armed criminal waving a gun at them.

 

[BillFairbanks]

She did not follow the law, she ignored it. Many legal ways to carry a firearm, she ignored them all.

No. There was no legal way for her to carry into the Luby’s back then. That’s why we have the CHL laws now. Her choosing to follow the law and leave her gun in the car resulted in the death of her parents.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Kar98]

No. There was no legal way for her to carry into the Luby’s back then. That’s why we have the CHL laws now. Her choosing to follow the law and leave her gun in the car resulted in the death of her parents.

No, it didn't. An unemployed loser shooting up the place resulted in the death of her parents.

 

[BillFairbanks]

No, it didn't. An unemployed loser shooting up the place resulted in the death of her parents.

That’s an interesting take.

So, you don’t think she should’ve been allowed to carry her gun into Luby’s?

Are you against our LTC laws that she lobbied for and helped get passed?

Is an armed person not more likely to survive a mass shooting?

What about the Zona Caliente shooting that was stopped by a person with a LTC?

Do you think more gun control is the answer?






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk