The cop gets the same due process, but due process isn't a factor in someone's employment is the point I'm trying to make. I can do something at work that's legally right, but morally bankrupt and lose my job. How is it any different for a police officer? Many (I'd bet most) of us don't get a review board at work to determine if we'll be disciplined if we screw up, or what that discipline will be.
Point being: you don't need to be proven guilty in a court of law to be stripped of your badge. At least, you shouldn't have to be. Unfortunately, that's about what it takes in CA. Texas is a lot more reasonable about dealing with things like this IMO. I'm not really even talking about the criminal charges that this guy is going to have to face... yet. But IMO he really shouldn't be a cop anymore.
The reason it is different for a police officer is that he is asked to do things that people in other jobs are not. There are much greater responsibilities placed on cops than most others. So there are some different rules that coorespond with that arangement.
I agree with you that you dont need to be found guilty in court to loose your job...i wouldnt support that.
As far as California that you keep referring to...Those guys (in metro cities in CA) face the steepest uphill fight of nearly any cops. Their hands are practically tied behind their backs and they have a ton of liberal politicians hacking away at their authority on a routine basis. (not to mention a dozen news choppers always lurking to film and and pick apart the slightest aggresive move they make.) And Californians wonder why LA county is like it is??? Hmmmmm..
Look...I wasnt naive, but I wasnt a cop till i was 30, and after I became one I was in for a education that blew my mind. Those that haven't done the job will have a hard time grasping whats its like to be tasked with the things most cops are throw into doing.
I think I have got way off track......