Hmmm. I am thinking that if he gets re-elected we will be back to rioting and looting US-wide.If Trump gets re-elected, I expect the cases to double before Thanksgiving.
Hmmm. I am thinking that if he gets re-elected we will be back to rioting and looting US-wide.If Trump gets re-elected, I expect the cases to double before Thanksgiving.
Hmmm. I am thinking that if he gets re-elected we will be back to rioting and looting US-wide.
Haha Is it wrong to hope someone just took a massive dump there first?
Haha Is it wrong to hope someone just took a massive dump there first?
Haha Is it wrong to hope someone just took a massive dump there first?
Needs a tide pod now to wash her mouth out
Well...are you going to let us know if she got preggers or not?Depends on who wins. Remember Cindy Sheehan? Front page news right up until Obama won. She was still doing the same protests because Obama didn't pull out right away, but she disappeared from the media coverage.
If Trump gets re-elected, I expect the cases to double before Thanksgiving.
....
To get a ratio you need a denominator.Strictly my opinion, it's irrelevant how many people test positive, what matters, is how many people are dying.
To get a ratio you need a denominator.
I believe the fatality ratio will continue to drop the more that are tested. And in the end, we will have yet another confirmation that the virus is no worse than the flu.And it keeps getting bigger.
Heard a Harvard math dude who’s been putting together one of the dashboards comment that Texas can’t make a dent in the pandemic until we reach 1536 tests per 100K and right we’re at 156 tests per 100K.
Think about for a minute: An Ivy League mathematician believes your can control what a virus does by testing people.
https://www.khou.com/mobile/article...tudy/285-e6e664a8-4f46-47f5-b5a2-41612ad8a8a2
What happens to the ratio when we get the capability to get to that number, given what we know now?
.. / .- --. .-. . .