Years ago, I had some hope for FactCheck.com.... then I read some of their stuff. Not much diff between the two as they both have leftist/commie agendas.Gonna vote "nah".
Not a fan of Snopes, but this snopes-like site has this:
Fact Check: George Soros NOT Arrested For Election Interference, NOT In Federal Custody | Lead StoriesWas George Soros arrested by the FBI and is he currently in federal custody in Philadelphia under accusation of election...leadstories.com
I am with you 110%. Twitter has been doing this, also. They add blue text to some tweets that say "This claim is under dispute". but they never offer one bit of evidence as to why they could even claim that (shocking, I know).And I get my hackles up whenever I see the words "fact check" because of Facebuk harassment and the constant overuse or underuse in the media. They don't fact check when they should, yet toss around slanted factchecks constantly. You know it's total BS when the media or FB says they fact checked something/anything.