DOJ is political?

[wiredgeorge]

Hope this hasn't been posted elsewhere:

https://trumptrainnews.com/2022/06/24/bidens-doj-releases-unprecedented-statement-following-scotus-gun-ruling/?wmg=1

 

[Axxe55]

Is the Pope Catholic? Does a bear shit in the woods? A pig's ass pork?

Hell yes the DOJ is political!

 

[jrbfishn]

What does one expect when those in power think the Constitution is not a list of rules bit instead a suggestion that can be ignored?

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

 

[benenglish]

This is bad. Very bad.

 

[Big Dipper]

Despite all of the hate leveled at Mitch McConnell, at least he was a major factor in preventing that twit Garland from becoming a Justice!

 

[Axxe55]

Despite all of the hate leveled at Mitch McConnell, at least he was a major factor in preventing that twit Garland from becoming a Justice!

And now he gets to be a bigger political hack as Attorney General.

 

[toddnjoyce]

This is bad. Very bad.

Yep, but not unexpected. Remember, Garland’s boss gave SCOTUS the bird last summer over the whole COVID eviction moratorium. Then look at Sheldon Whitehouse and his crusade against the court. Garland is just following in his footsteps.

The problem is this entire administration and the formal Democrat party are so drunk with progressive/socialist activism that it’s tuned a lot of America out of politics.

I haven’t ever in my lifetime experienced a political administration so openly hostile to SCOTUS and to the Constitution in general.

 

[toddnjoyce]

So everyone knows what DOJ said, here’s the entire statement (it’s public domain, co copyright infringement).

Department of Justice
Office of Public Affairs
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Thursday, June 23, 2022
Justice Department Statement on Supreme Court Ruling on New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen

The Department of Justice today released the following statement from spokeswoman Dena Iverson following the Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc., et al. v. Bruen, Superintendent of New York State Police, et al.:

“We respectfully disagree with the Court’s conclusion that the Second Amendment forbids New York’s reasonable requirement that individuals seeking to carry a concealed handgun must show that they need to do so for self-defense. The Department of Justice remains committed to saving innocent lives by enforcing and defending federal firearms laws, partnering with state, local and tribal authorities and using all legally available tools to tackle the epidemic of gun violence plaguing our communities.”

Justice Department Statement on Supreme Court Ruling on New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen

The Department of Justice today released the following statement from spokeswoman Dena Iverson following the Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc., et al. v. Bruen, Superintendent of New York State Police, et al.:

www.justice.gov

Unheard of.

 

[ronbwolf]

It is now the Department of Injustice, staffed by deep state KGB Stasi thugs!

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk

 

[kbaxter60]

The DOJ?
How about Pentagon?

The Pentagon Announces It Will Refuse to Follow Any Laws Restricting Abortion Access

"This is a dangerous form of corruption that poses a direct threat to the rule of law."

beckernews.com

ETA : I don't THINK it's a satire site?

 

[Big Dipper]

And now he gets to be a bigger political hack as Attorney General.

At least that isn’t likely to be for a “lifetime“!!!

 

[Axxe55]

At least that isn’t likely to be for a “lifetime“!!!

Quite true!

 

[oldag]

They can disagree all they want. Won't change the ruling.

 

[seeker_two]

They need to rename the DOJ to the Department of Political Extortion & Supression......DOPES.

Sent from my SM-G715A using Tapatalk

 

[motorcarman]

I posted this in another forum section but all gov't agencies are NOT citizen friendly!

 

[Mowingmaniac 24/7]

So by declaring "They respectfully disagree" mean they will not follow the law?

 

[Alpha.Geek]

ALMOST as political as the ATF has gotten... ... ...

 

[Big Green]

The DOJ?
How about Pentagon?

The Pentagon Announces It Will Refuse to Follow Any Laws Restricting Abortion Access

"This is a dangerous form of corruption that poses a direct threat to the rule of law."

beckernews.com

ETA : I don't THINK it's a satire site?

“Now, women serving here stateside are going to be subject to the whims [of the states] that they are involuntarily assigned to.”

So service members can take NFA items, or other firearms, to any state they are stationed in now?

 

[Lazyfaire]

What does one expect when those in power think the Constitution is not a list of rules bit instead a suggestion that can be ignored?

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

What those in the government do not understand is that the powers of the Constitution is not to create a restraint on the people, but to restrain the government from over-using its power!

 

[G O B]

The finest Government that money can buy.