Durham’s Surprise find

[seeker_two]

Nobody here knows the skill of "cut and paste"?....

 

[toddnjoyce]

Nobody here knows the skill of "cut and paste"?....

Why? It’s copyrighted material and that’s a violation of our code of conduct and sets texcross up for a lawsuit. Who’s want to do that?

 

[Havok1]

Why? It’s copyrighted material and that’s a violation of our code of conduct and sets texcross up for a lawsuit. Who’s want to do that?

first, you can copy and paste information from an article without it being a copyright violation.

Second, because we are two pages into this thread and nothing new has been revealed.

 

[Renegade]

Durham was just a diversion Nothing will ever come of whatever it is he is doing

 

[Axxe55]

Durham was just a diversion Nothing will ever come of whatever it is he is doing

HEWAS SUPPOSEDLY TO BE THE MSGIC FINDEROF THE TRUTHBUT SO FAR HE HASN'T SHOWN JACK SHIT YET!

 

[Renegade]

HEWAS SUPPOSEDLY TO BE THE MSGIC FINDEROF THE TRUTHBUT SO FAR HE HASN'T SHOWN JACK SHIT YET!

Barr appointed him and I think the purpose was to calm folks down and think something was going to get done and by the time folks realized he was doing nothing it was too late to do something via other avenues.

This is also why Garland did not fire him. He knew he was just for show. The uniparty had already cut the deal.

 

[Havok1]

Barr appointed him and I think the purpose was to calm folks down and think something was going to get done and by the time folks realized he was doing nothing it was too late to do something via other avenues.

This is also why Garland did not fire him. He knew he was just for show. The uniparty had already cut the deal.

And barr is a swamp creature. So I don’t know why anyone would have high expectations.

 

[toddnjoyce]

first, you can copy and paste information from an article without it being a copyright violation.

Second, because we are two pages into this thread and nothing new has been revealed.

You can argue with the site owners. And your understanding of fair use of copyright does not appear to line up with the doctrine.

 

[kbaxter60]

Why? It’s copyrighted material and that’s a violation of our code of conduct and sets texcross up for a lawsuit. Who’s want to do that?

Truly. I think he meant to say "the helpful paraphrase".

 

[toddnjoyce]

Truly. I think he meant to say "the helpful paraphrase".

Then what I put in post 1 covers it. Other than a couple of names, the entire Steele dossier was literal fiction. And Durham found the evidentiary proof.