Even Red counties can be gun morons

Discussion in 'Activism' started by sdismukes, Apr 14, 2018.

  1. sdismukes

    sdismukes Active Member

    527
    85
    28
    Nov 26, 2014
    Erath County
    Our local County Clerk's office has signs posted prohibiting guns. Not the whole courthouse, just their office. Per state law, courtrooms themselves, and rooms used for the direct function of the court can be posted. I would read that last bit to include jury rooms, witness prep rooms, holding rooms, etc. Erath County claims the Clerk's office is a direct function since they file court documents there. I say the words "file documents" is administrative, not judicial in nature. But they refuse to remove the signs.

    There are about 3.5% of Texas adults with a license to carry. The other 96.5% of the population falls under generic laws prohibiting any kind of carry outside their vehicle, home, RV, vacation home, or boat (Castle doctrine locations) and other prohibited conditions (felon, non citizen, mental defective etc). This 3.5% of Texan adults are the most well behaved in the State - by at least a factor of 10. Even LEOs have at least double the rate of felony convictions as licensees as a percentage of their respective populations. No one is talking about disarming the cops.

    So my question is - just who is it they are afraid of? The least worrisome group in the state, or real criminals?

    I believe they pick us licensees because (1) we are easily identifiable - we have a state-issued permit - and (2) we are likely armed at any given time. The least problematic of the population is the first disarmed. It's not like psychopaths, drug dealers, felons, and other criminals carry an ID with them, nor are they going to give up their guns because someone wrote a law in a book requiring it.

    I figure if the entire population of Erath County committed felonies at the rate all licensees commit them across the state, there would be 3-5 felonies per year in this county. If the actual number of felonies across the state were evenly distributed by population, you'd expect around 60 felonies a year in this county.

    The process to contest the signs is to complain to the county (I did, and got a letter back from the County Attorney saying the filing made it a protected place) and if they don't comply then to file a complaint with the state Attorney General. I did, and they immediately emailed me saying "'complaint received" but they are holding back any action while other stuff goes through the courts.

    Since 2016 the AG has written many opinions to city, county and state admin offices and courthouses specifically noting County Clerk, Tax, and other administrative offices are not protected places. Several courthouses tried posting the whole building, others large portions including restrooms. Posting the Clerk's office means any visit to the courthouse which includes the Clerk's office effectively posts the whole courthouse as licensees won't go back and forth to their cars to arm/disarm depending on which office they visit next. The 30.06 and .07 statutes were written to give private property owners a means to ban guns; hardly anyone does. Administrative state and county offices are hardly private property. Add the logic of who they are trying to disarm and why, and the whole sign issue is nonsensical.

    Well, it's about to come to a head. Waller County (Hempstead) received a complaint, then sued the complainant because he should have gone to the AG (which I think he did). Yes, the COUNTY sued the INDIVIDUAL for complaining. The local court agreed with the county, the appeals court disagreed. It's now at the State Supreme Court. Up till now it's been the AG's opinion driving the ban of these signs. Now the courts are about to weigh in for one hopes is the final say.
     


    motorcarman and Darkpriest667 like this.
  2. Darkpriest667

    Darkpriest667 Active Member

    764
    183
    43
    Jan 13, 2017
    Fort Worth
    Thanks for the insight. Appreciate you taking the time to keep us informed on this.
     
  3. Renegade

    Renegade SuperOwner

    5,485
    172
    63
    Mar 5, 2008
    Texas
    Probably the biggest mistake gun owners make when dealing with anti-gun types is thinking they operate from logic and facts. I waugh every time someone points out AR-15 is not an assault weapon for example.

    Do you have a case name so we can watch it?
     
  4. deemus

    deemus TGT Addict

    5,113
    268
    83
    Feb 1, 2010
    DFW
    There is a history of angry defendants / family of convicted persons, "getting even" with the judge or DA who put them away. Not a ton of those, but the courthouse is a place where emotions run high.

    They may have other reasons, but I recall a case around Kaufman or Tyler, somewhere East of here where a DA or judge was shot in that type situation.
     
    Last edited: Apr 14, 2018
  5. sdismukes

    sdismukes Active Member

    527
    85
    28
    Nov 26, 2014
    Erath County
    Agreed. The judge and DA would be in rooms associated with direct judicial. Those rooms are already posted no guns and I have no issue with that.

    I believe filing court records is simply administrative and no more dangerous to the clerks than maybe getting a paper cut.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  6. TX OMFS

    TX OMFS Active Member

    443
    125
    43
    Nov 3, 2014
    San Antonio
    If we put up some signs no one will commit murder. Maybe we should make murder illegal.
     
  7. sdismukes

    sdismukes Active Member

    527
    85
    28
    Nov 26, 2014
    Erath County
    I keep telling our high and mighty legislators - those being the guys lobbyists have convinced are super important - guys who read and believe their own press releases - I tell them that no law ever written, no Commandment ever carved in stone, ever stopped a guy - froze him in his tracks - from committing a crime.

    Told that to our local Sheriff - he laughed, but one of those "damn, that's right" laughs.

    Somehow these people have been convinced they are omnipotent, that their laws mean something to people who flat ignore all laws from the git-go.

    <deep sigh>

    Laws work in this country because we volunteer to obey them. We know if we as a society don't, we will have anarchy followed by a police state headed either by the government or a warlord, depending how bad it gets. Laws tell us a penalty for doing wrong and if caught. Put those together, most of us feel compelled to obey the law. But for those who give a flying crap about it, laws on the books are mere words with no teeth.
     
  8. Coiled

    Coiled Active Member

    770
    71
    28
    Nov 25, 2016
    Huntsville-ish
    Well said, especially the bolded.
     
  9. TheMailMan

    TheMailMan Active Member

    466
    163
    43
    Dec 3, 2015
    North of Kaufman
    Man made laws ONLY affect the law abiding. It's been that way forever. Break a natural law and you're going to pay quickly.

    However the Left always believes that Laws will accomplish "something".
     
    TX OMFS likes this.

Share This Page