For American gun owners, who will be our REAL choice in 2020?

[AustinN4]

If he meant that none of the currently proposed fixes would have stopped these incidents, then I believe he is probably correct.

I agree, but that isn't what he said.

 

[HKaltwasser]

Define "All of these shooters", cause I don't believe that is a correct statement. Did the Columbine shooters obtain their guns legally? And did the Sandy Hook shooter? Unless I am mistaken, I don't believe either did.

Yes, I meant the last two without going through history. I understand many are stolen as well.

 

[oldag]

Yes, I meant the last two without going through history. I understand many are stolen as well.

I will edit my comment because that was my point. I edited another part that was supposed to be at the end of second paragraph but I mistakenly put in the first for some dumb reason.

...

Also, it is what I said and confirmed in the third paragraph but I changed the first:

I am more confused now.

Who's on first?

 

[V-Tach]

My threshold is not another damn inch..............

They want "compromise"...............

What are they giving? Government isn't giving up anything. The Politicians aren't giving up anything. The Left/Dems aren't giving up anything.

Only law abiding American Citizens are giving anything..........

Compromise only inches us closer and closer to socialism/communism, because we alway compromise to the Lefts/Dems demands...............

Not another inch.............

 

[HKaltwasser]

double.

 

[HKaltwasser]

I am more confused now.

Who's on first?

Haha, I'm not sure what you're asking?

 

[V-Tach]

I don't know's on third.............

 

[easy rider]

We've had many debates on gun laws, but which are right or wrong doesn't really answer the question of who is the best choice for president. Given the choices as of right now, I can think of nobody that has a snowball's chance better than Trump, unless you are planning to vote democrat to which you should know where that would lead.

 

[WAYnorthTX]

I don't know's on third.............

Who's on first, what's on second, and I don't know is on third.
On topic, MY choice depends on what President Trump actually does. He often says one thing, sounding like he will cave in to the dems on something and then reverse himself and do the right thing. My bottom line is if he signs a law requiring background checks on private sales between private individuals, I will not vote for him, or anyone. I will be through voting, period. If this happens, it is just a matter of time before a great deal of 'unpleasantness'.

 

[WAYnorthTX]

This from the people who demonized McCain.

https://s16-us2.startpage.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=https://clarityofsignal.files.wordpress.com/2017/11/screen-shot-2017-11-11-at-10-05-21-pm.png?w=680&sp=f882c03e16810efe2e6666e2546780c5&anticache=999271
https://www.globalresearch.ca/john-...fighting-groups-no-criticism-from-msm/5576594

 

[easy rider]

Who's on first, what's on second, and I don't know is on third.
On topic, MY choice depends on what President Trump actually does. He often says one thing, sounding like he will cave in to the dems on something and then reverse himself and do the right thing. My bottom line is if he signs a law requiring background checks on private sales between private individuals, I will not vote for him, or anyone. I will be through voting, period. If this happens, it is just a matter of time before a great deal of 'unpleasantness'.

Let's hope that there isn't too many that don't vote on the right, because that unpleasantness may be upon us sooner than you expect.

 

[WAYnorthTX]

For those of you who were thinking about voting for Pocahontas, she just released a new proposal on guns that may interest you-
https://www.dailywire.com/news/50496/warren-releases-massive-gun-control-plan-includes-frank-camp
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/el...foxnews/politics (Internal - Politics - Text)

 

[ZX9RCAM]

Have any of the mass shooting incidents involved suppressors?

 

[easy rider]

From what I have learned, no suppressor has shot anyone.

 

[ZX9RCAM]

Boo....

 

[HKaltwasser]

Have any of the mass shooting incidents involved suppressors?

Funny you mention that, what was the last thing he threatened to ban? Sorry, the trust is at arms length. No, he didn't do it through executive order, but I don't see any limits at this point.

The way I see it, he doesn't gain anything, but loses many through false claims of background checks when the last TWO mass shooters weapons were bought through NICS checks.

 

[easy rider]

Fake news, he didn't threaten to ban suppressors, when asked he said he would consider a ban. That's not threatening.

 

[HKaltwasser]

Fake news, he didn't threaten to ban suppressors, when asked he said he would consider a ban. That's not threatening.

Consider, threaten.

No worries, he has to earn my vote.

 

[ZX9RCAM]

My suppressor question was in reference to Warrens proposal.

 

[AustinN4]

For those of you who were thinking about voting for Pocahontas, she just released a new proposal on guns that may interest you-
https://www.dailywire.com/news/50496/warren-releases-massive-gun-control-plan-includes-frank-camp
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/elizabeth-warren-taxes-nra-investigation-gun-control?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed: foxnews/politics (Internal - Politics - Text)

Think about your above post if you end up not voting for Trump.