Doesn't really change things. More like playing Texas Hold'em. Everybody is now all in but the game is the same.
True, the lower court ruling would stand in the case of a tie, but in a presidential election the Supreme Court may be the lower court. Depends on if its the states or federal government that are appealing.I agree, 12th Amendment, settles ties and other Electoral College BS.
In the event of State lawsuits centering on the illegal acts, or alleged illegal acts, to manipulate the outcome of an election, just as in 2000, it goes to the State Supreme Court. Regardless of outcome at the State level, one party or the other will appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. Where.... in the event of a tie, the lower Court Ruling stands.
ETA: clarification, eliminate rambling, correct F/Up's, and numerous other consistent inconsistencies
Correct!True, the lower court ruling would stand in the case of a tie, but in a presidential election the Supreme Court may be the lower court. Depends on if its the states or federal government that are appealing.
I think your post was pretty much right on. Yet Collins is NOT a Republican. Less than a RINO, even.If a R senator (e.g., Collins)
The one that concerns me are the mail-in ballots. The thought is, that they are intended to confuse the election results and tie things up for months, and possible allow Pelosi to assume the seat of president. I think many of us believe that is the strategy behind the Democrats pushing so hard for mail-in ballots for the election.
So now, are things further confused because of RBG's death yesterday? Does her death change things more in favor of Trump, or Biden after the November election?
Many of us think that something has already happened to Roberts. He has been erratic, at best.... Let something happen to CJ Roberts and his seat and position
I hear you.I think your post was pretty much right on. Yet Collins is NOT a Republican. Less than a RINO, even.
I honestly wonder if he is being blackmailed.Many of us think that something has already happened to Roberts. He has been erratic, at best.
He's trying to appear impartial by playing both sides. I wish that he would be more of a constitutionalist and leave politics out of it.Many of us think that something has already happened to Roberts. He has been erratic, at best.
I honestly wonder if he is being blackmailed.
Makes you wonder.
Deep state globalist have more tentacles than a Texas full of octupuses ...
I seriously doubt it's the same John Roberts. SCOTUS justices tend not to hobnob with politicians and their associates out of impropriety. Scandals are too easily implied.During the Epstein investigation, there was a name, John Roberts that surfaced during that investigation. Is, or could this be the same SC justice John Roberts? At the same time, John and Roberts both are very common names so it could be an entirely different John Roberts.
*octupussiesMakes you wonder.
Deep state globalist have more tentacles than a Texas full of octupuses ...