What part of a 27 round indoor test proves it's reliable, as you claim in your opening comments?
Most of us here are familiar with IV8888.
"Next time I'm in a firefight with Taliban forces I totally want a Hi-Point C9 in my hands."
- No one ever
If you go back and watch the video again, take a look at the baffles above the targets: They are peppered with bullet holes!
Does not speak well for shooters who frequent that facility, or for a range staff that allows that to happen.
If you go back and watch the video again, take a look at the baffles above the targets: They are peppered with bullet holes!
Does not speak well for shooters who frequent that facility, or for a range staff that allows that to happen.
40Arpent Through out the video I talk about No FTF's, and no FTE's which I believe would constitute reliability, also I invite you to view another youtuber iraqveteran8888 who's channel you can go to via our video by clicking on the lower third where I speak about him in that same intro they did an extensive 4 part torture test on the Hi point C9 and the only way they finally blew it up was to pack the barrel full of powder and C-clamp the slide shut ( if that ain't reliable I don't know what is Sir!) they also speak on the fact of accuracy numerous times. I hope this helps..
40Arpent Through out the video I talk about No FTF's, and no FTE's which I believe would constitute reliability.
If you think 27 rounds constitutes reliability, any credibility you think you may have had just went out the window.
STOP hovering over this thread!I am more then willing to take suggestions on how we can improve, and we welcome any suggestions ....
These are fun videos
Said 9 rounds. I think I counted eight first mag. Ten in second and third mags. Am I wrong?