Would you explain that please
So you don't think more Dems turned out. Pot. Kettle. Black.Not a red herring.... it's my OPINION, same as yours... is your opinion of the loss a red herring?
Show me the turnout numbers. I wouldn't think more Dems turned out than usual in Georgia if it wasn't for the placement of drop boxes in D areas paid for by a billionaire, and vote harvesting by the machine that Abrams put together. But I do think I remember a report saying there was low Repub turnout. However, I've slept since then.
Congress hasn't passed a "budget" in many years. If you are talking about spending bills, the problem is that Repubs vote for them too.... Harris hasn't had to be the tie breaker in any spending bill that I know of... So the Georgia Senate election really has not had an effect.
Yup, I heard you the first time. And I replied that no other Republican has had that level of fraud, targeted in specific electoral areas (Dems had a plan, they took note of Trumps 2016 electoral win, Repubs were clueless/powerless), under covid rules. I will keep saying that, and you will keep implying that I am dumb. We can circle each other as long as you want. But hang on to that TDS sir, you're going to need it come 2024.
So you don't think more Dems turned out. Pot. Kettle. Black.
Keep playing with semantics. Nice try, but no success.
Budget vs spending bill.A swing and a miss... I used "I think". If I had stated it as fact, THAT would have been pot kettle black.
However, after I stated an OPINION, as evidenced by using "I think", I went out and did some research and gave you credit for being right about turnout. Doesn't seem to have earned me any points.
How am I playing with semantics?
We have no idea as to what you need explaining, or what post you are referring to.its ok i don't need to know
Budget vs spending bill.