Furthermore, 1911 cited Texas v White as a reason Texas can't secede. Please note the following from Texas v White:
Moreover, "Both the original (1836) and the current (1876) Texas Constitutions also state that "All political power is inherent in the people ... they have at all times the inalienable right to alter their government in such manner as they might think proper."
Didn’t the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Texas v. White prove that secession is unconstitutional?
NO. With all due respect, 1911 is mistaken. Texas v White did not address secession. Period.
"...Our conclusion therefore is, that Texas continued to be a State, and a State of the Union."
— Texas v. White, 74 U.S. 700, 703 (1868)
In other words, Texas, per Texas v White, never seceded.
You are looking at everything with rose tinted glasses. Nothing gives the state of Texas the right to secede. The Texas vs. White case proves that even if Texas were to secede the Union (read the United States) does not even recognize it in secession, therefor it is still a part of the Union. Ergo, the state of Texas cannot secede from the Union. It is an insoluble relationship in the eyes of the Fed.
You aren't the first person to think about Texas secession. There's been a group called the Republic of Texas that has been fighting this for decades. What have they achieved? Nothing.
Have you even looked at the Civil War? You know, where we fought for years, killing millions, to grant the freedom of individual states?
Texas, will never be free again. You can rattle your saber and talk big on the internet, you might even die trying, but it will not be free again. There is no social, economic, or even land based derivation great enough to proclaim independence. There is no legal basis for it, and the most powerful country in the world stands to lose something considerable in the process, and they certainly won't allow that.
Until this becomes a popular decision amongst the people, it will always be a go-nowhere endeavor.