Kennedy/Gabbard Ticket (vote here)

[SGT Dave]

If an RFK/Tulsi Gabbard independent ticket were on the ballot, and election day was today, would you vote for them?

 

[Steve In Texas]

RFK & Tulsi Gabbard could take over the Libertarian Ticket and thus not need to go through building ballot access independently. At the national level I believe the Libertarian Party (LP-national) lost all credibility in 2016 when their party position became "Go vote for Hillary to stop the Trump Train." It saddened me to listen to Johnson & Weld destroy LP like that. Kennedy and Gabbard could give LP new relevance with a promise of more.

I would be very hesitant to vote that ticket as I do not trust them on The Second Amendment.

 

[Gordo]

Hm, a demo turned independent, and a demo turned republican.
What could possibly go wrong?

I would rather see Sheriff Mark Lamb and MTG.
Both would be good in a bar fight.

​

 

[seeker_two]

As a Dem primary vote, yes. Split that party. As a GOP primary vote, they won't even be a bump to the Trump Train. Same in the general election, but the fix is in already. Might be good to have another party to join Trump in the election fraud lawsuits.....

 

[oldag]

Now way. But I hope they run as independents and take Dem votes.

 

[Havok1]

I’m not very liberal so no.

 

[Byrd666]

NOPE.

 

[toddnjoyce]

Might as well ask if I want a bud light.

 

[Eastexasrick]

Do I want a Pontiac 400 or a Chevy 350 block dropped on my nuts? Same answer.

 

[Big Green]

He may not be as liberal as some others, but he’s still way too liberal for me. I still don’t trust her.

 

[billtool]

They are both crazy gun grabbers. Hard No. Tulsi is pretty hot though...

 

[Hoji]

They are both crazy gun grabbers. Hard No. Tulsi is pretty hot though...
View attachment 408450

Tulsi has done a 180 on the Second Amendment.

 

[wiredgeorge]

After pretty much failing as a Dem, she has been sliding right as the political current seems to drift that way. Not stirring up waves of trust with me. Kennedy? No way.

 

[glenbo]

I gladly voted yes in hope that they would split the democrap party.

 

[Sasquatch]

If I were voting in a dem primary sure, but would they get my vote in the general? Heeelll nooo. Kennedy is shit on guns, he's too soft headed on welfare policies, the only thing I really dig about him is his hatred for the Big Pharma crowd.

IF he got elected, I fully expect him to get the treatment his dad and uncle got.

 

[jrbfishn]

Hard no vote. Not even a consideration.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

 

[glenbo]

We're screwed.

 

[Texasjack]

They are both better candidates - and better people - than the Democrats have offered up in decades. However, I can't get past their anti-2A beliefs.

 

[Hoji]

They are both better candidates - and better people - than the Democrats have offered up in decades. However, I can't get past their anti-2A beliefs.

As I posted earlier, TG has done a complete 180 on 2A.

If you voted for DJT the first time, you voted for a NY democrat turned populist and if you voted for him in 2020, well, you know the whole “take the guns first/due process later thing.

Personally I could never vote for a RFK ticket in any flavor, but could possibly be convinced to vote for a ticket with TG on it depending on who she was running with. Say a Ramaswamy/Gabbard ticket I could probably vote for and feel clean afterwards.

Don’t forget, if you voted for Reagan, he started out as a democrat as well and is responsible for the birth of gun control in California and lobbied republicans in congress to pass the 1994 AWB and before that, the Hugh’s Act.

Bush Sr gave us a permanent AWB.

GWB stated for the record that he would sign a renewal of the 1994 AWB if it got to his desk.

I could go on, but you know, the thing.

 

[TXAZ]

I gladly voted yes in hope that they would split the democrap party.

Thats actually a smart strategy. (Do you remember Ed Muskie?)