DK Firearms

Knowingly exposing others to HIV will no longer be a felony in California

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Darkpriest667

    Actually Attends
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Jan 13, 2017
    4,494
    96
    Jarrell TX, United States
    What the hell? I wouldn't believe this was real if it wasn't the LA TIMES reporting it!
    http://www.latimes.com/politics/ess...ades-from-felony-to-1507331544-htmlstory.html


    “Today California took a major step toward treating HIV as a public health issue, instead of treating people living with HIV as criminals,” Wiener said in a statement. “HIV should be treated like all other serious infectious diseases, and that’s what SB 239 does.”

    these people are deranged... If you knowingly expose someone to a deadly virus you are at the very least morally bankrupt... But no in California you ARENT CRIMINAL FOR IT!


    Oh this also counts for people giving blood at blood banks in California.. WTF
    Lynx Defense
     

    easy rider

    Summer Slacker
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 10, 2015
    31,520
    96
    Odessa, Tx
    What? You can't shoot at someone, because guns are BAD, but someone can infect others with a dangerous disease that can cause misery and high costs in the hopes it doesn't kill you and that's perfectly ok?
     

    RodKo40S&W

    New Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 9, 2017
    43
    11
    Austin,Texas
    Unbelievable how demented this state is getting. More worried about the label of "criminal" applied to this with HIV. To me, if you fail to withhold that information from your partner you are a criminal.
     

    Younggun

    Certified Jackass
    TGT Supporter
    Local Business Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Jul 31, 2011
    53,727
    96
    hill co.
    There has been a long term push to remove requirements to notify sexual partners of STD infections including HIV/AIDS. The arguments are as poor as any other leftists might use to push an agenda.

    Like other leftist arguments it requires mind numbing levels of double think. You must be able to hold completely opposite views on your head at one time on the same subject and only use each view when it supports your narrative, often requiring that you contradict yourself multiple times during a discussion. Example being that you must see HIV as a major public health issue while also believing that it's not important to require those infected notify their sexual partners in order to help prevent the spread of HIV/AIDS. It's both a major public health issue and a minor concern.
     

    billyb4u64

    Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 1, 2017
    158
    11
    What the hell? I wouldn't believe this was real if it wasn't the LA TIMES reporting it!
    http://www.latimes.com/politics/ess...ades-from-felony-to-1507331544-htmlstory.html


    “Today California took a major step toward treating HIV as a public health issue, instead of treating people living with HIV as criminals,” Wiener said in a statement. “HIV should be treated like all other serious infectious diseases, and that’s what SB 239 does.”

    these people are deranged... If you knowingly expose someone to a deadly virus you are at the very least morally bankrupt... But no in California you ARENT CRIMINAL FOR IT!


    Oh this also counts for people giving blood at blood banks in California.. WTF
    That is what a GAY govenor & congress will deliver

    Sent from my LGMS550 using Tapatalk
     

    oldag

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Feb 19, 2015
    17,531
    96
    They are too busy writing laws to prosecute people for using the wrong pronoun when addressing transvestites.

    Dang, too slow on the draw. Vaquero got there first.
     

    Darkpriest667

    Actually Attends
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Jan 13, 2017
    4,494
    96
    Jarrell TX, United States

    ZX9RCAM

    Over the Rainbow bridge...
    TGT Supporter
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    May 14, 2008
    59,918
    96
    The Woodlands, Tx.
    Yeah I saw that, it deserves it's own thread because gender pronoun crap is stupid... There are 3.. he, she, and it.. it only qualifies in cases of 1 in like 300,000 where someone is born with a MUTATION that gives them both sexual organs (intersexual it IS a thing.) but beyond that these other weird ones are insane.
    I believe the word you are looking for is hermaphrodite....
     

    ZX9RCAM

    Over the Rainbow bridge...
    TGT Supporter
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    May 14, 2008
    59,918
    96
    The Woodlands, Tx.
    No, I meant intersexual. Hermaphrodite is not the proper nomenclature.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersex

    From your link...

    "Intersex people were previously referred to as hermaphrodites, "congenital eunuchs",[5][6] or even congenitally "frigid".[7] Such terms have fallen out of favor; in particular, the term "hermaphrodite" is considered to be misleading, stigmatizing, and scientifically specious."

    Evidently, hermaphrodite is not PC anymore, lol.
     
    Top Bottom