List of bills introduced since Vegas Shooting

[Darkpriest667]

Here is the latest list of anti-gun legislation filed as a response to the Las Vegas tragedy since 10/1/2017:

U.S. House of Representatives
HR 3947 – Bans parts and accessories that increase the rate of fire of a semi-automatic firearm
HR 3962 – Bans online sales of ammunition
HR 3984 – Repeals the Lawful Protection in Commerce law that would allow lawsuits against FFL’s and manufacturers
HR 3986 – Would require the placement of tracking ID into ‘all’ firearms sold in America
HR 3987 – Would require a fee to purchase a firearm through NICS and use these monies to fund the CDC to conduct research on gun violence that was previously found to be biased by Congress
HR 3998 – Bans firearms for known or ‘suspected’ terrorists
HR 3999 – Bans parts that increase the rate of fire of a semi-automatic firearm
HR 4018 – Institutes a ‘3’ day waiting period nationally for purchase of handgun
HR 4025 – Expands reporting of multiple firearms sales
HR 4052 – Would ‘ban’ possession and transfer of large capacity magazines (More than 10 rounds)
HR 4057 – Expansion of Prohibition for firearms ownership for being on a Terrorist Watch List

U.S. Senate
S. 1915 – Would require all firearms to be personalized for restricted access and use
S. 1916 – Bans parts and accessories that increase the rate of fire of a semi-automatic firearm
S. 1923 – Expands background checks of firearms
S. 1939 – Repeals the Lawful Protection in Commerce law that would allow lawsuits against FFL’s and manufacturers
S. 1945 – Would ‘ban’ possession and transfer of large capacity magazines (More than 10 rounds)"

 

[easy rider]

Of course, most of which had no bearing on the Las Vegas shootings.

 

[Southpaw]

Here is the latest list of anti-gun legislation filed as a response to the Las Vegas tragedy since 10/1/2017:

U.S. House of Representatives
HR 3947 – Bans parts and accessories that increase the rate of fire of a semi-automatic firearm
HR 3962 – Bans online sales of ammunition
HR 3984 – Repeals the Lawful Protection in Commerce law that would allow lawsuits against FFL’s and manufacturers
HR 3986 – Would require the placement of tracking ID into ‘all’ firearms sold in America
HR 3987 – Would require a fee to purchase a firearm through NICS and use these monies to fund the CDC to conduct research on gun violence that was previously found to be biased by Congress
HR 3998 – Bans firearms for known or ‘suspected’ terrorists
HR 3999 – Bans parts that increase the rate of fire of a semi-automatic firearm
HR 4018 – Institutes a ‘3’ day waiting period nationally for purchase of handgun
HR 4025 – Expands reporting of multiple firearms sales
HR 4052 – Would ‘ban’ possession and transfer of large capacity magazines (More than 10 rounds)
HR 4057 – Expansion of Prohibition for firearms ownership for being on a Terrorist Watch List

U.S. Senate
S. 1915 – Would require all firearms to be personalized for restricted access and use
S. 1916 – Bans parts and accessories that increase the rate of fire of a semi-automatic firearm
S. 1923 – Expands background checks of firearms
S. 1939 – Repeals the Lawful Protection in Commerce law that would allow lawsuits against FFL’s and manufacturers
S. 1945 – Would ‘ban’ possession and transfer of large capacity magazines (More than 10 rounds)"

At some point, and not too long either, I expect all this and a forever AWB once the Dems capture both Congress and the Oval Office.

 

[kenboyles72]

Sad really. For once in a great while, the US is in a position to change for the better, but social media and mainstream are keeping the masses ignorant. We have three more years, then I see US going down a slippery, steep slope of communism.

 

[grumper]

"Meh. Who cares? We should let them regulate <insert thingamajiggy here> because I don't want to lose my guns due to these stupid semi-automatic toys. Who needs to own something like them? Ya can't hunt with them. Let them ban, I got mine already."

Seen these and similar comments from various "gun rights" orgs and online personalities and even here on this forum. Thanks a bunch, NRA and backstabbers.

 

[F350-6]

At some point, and not too long either, I expect all this and a forever AWB once the Dems capture both Congress and the Oval Office.

They had that with the last POTUS at first, they had the oval office and the senate during Sandy Hook. Luckily our government is very inefficient and politicians love to posture and speak out in a manner very different than their actions.

Then again, the republicans can't seem to pass any legislation that they all campaigned on, so maybe they will pass a bump stock ban. That would be keeping on par with doing the opposite of everything they said they would do. No idea if POTUS would veto or sign.

 

[grumper]

Then again, the republicans can't seem to pass any legislation that they all campaigned on, so maybe they will pass a bump stock ban. That would be keeping on par with doing the opposite of everything they said they would do. No idea if POTUS would veto or sign.

The silly thing is if they do pass an AWB, bump stock ban, a ban on every single part or attachment that can possibly increase the ROF of semi-automatics, the only guns NOT affected would be real deal machineguns. Because every one of those proposed laws exempts MGs or specifically targets semi-automatic firearms.

 

[easy rider]

The silly thing is if they do pass an AWB, bump stock ban, a ban on every single part or attachment that can possibly increase the ROF of semi-automatics, the only guns NOT affected would be real deal machineguns. Because every one of those proposed laws exempts MGs or specifically targets semi-automatic firearms.

For now.

 

[Younggun]

Most of that stuff is offered multiple times in every session and is generally ignored. Most of it will be ignored this time as well.

 

[Vaquero]

Most of that stuff is offered multiple times in every session and is generally ignored. Most of it will be ignored this time as well.

I hope.

 

[easy rider]

Ditto.

 

[Southpaw]

They had that with the last POTUS at first, they had the oval office and the senate during Sandy Hook. Luckily our government is very inefficient and politicians love to posture and speak out in a manner very different than their actions.

Then again, the republicans can't seem to pass any legislation that they all campaigned on, so maybe they will pass a bump stock ban. That would be keeping on par with doing the opposite of everything they said they would do. No idea if POTUS would veto or sign.

They had the Senate yes, but not the House. The Dems are much more lockstep then the R's are and will have this whole question of guns answered as soon as they have their majorities in Congress and the Presidency.

 

[easy rider]

THE SKY IS FALLING!

Guess their isn't much I can do until the chunks start hitting the ground.