If you didn't see what happened off camera how can you make that judgement?Even if we were missed anything before the camrea was rolling it obviously wasn't enough to get him cuffed.
If you didn't see what happened off camera how can you make that judgement?
I made the judgment that he had not done anything that bad because he was not cuffed.
I can make that judgement because when the video started he was not in cuffs. Or did I miss somthing?
Yeah, you do.
We dont know....it wasn't recorded. Thats the point.
It appears there was over reaction on the LEO, but whenever I see something being recorded (remember, there was someone standing their with a video device for some reason) I'm suspicious.
Re-read the thread. I didn't give anyone the benefit of the doubt. I simply questioned someones comment about what happened before the recording started. I have yet to defend this LEO...in fact I rarely defend anyone, merely withold judgement pending ALL the facts. It is usually the merry band of TGT cop bashers that only need partial evidence to jump on any LEO.Ridiculous. Deputy Gutoverbelt needs to get a grip.
So the cop who obviously overreacted gets the benefit of the doubt. Typical.
Re-read the thread. I didn't give anyone the benefit of the doubt. I simply questioned someones comment about what happened before the recording started. I have yet to defend this LEO...in fact I rarely defend anyone, merely withold judgement pending ALL the facts. It is usually the merry band of TGT cop bashers that only need partial evidence to jump on any LEO.
Sorry to disappoint.
Sounds like those two have a history. Some thing about their interaction just sounds personal....