Sage is defending the po-po! [marking date on my calendar]
When I say odd, I guess I mean, 41 is a hard number to account for mathematically.
That is fair. What is even more fair is if you would so state rather than making a qualative statement.Admittedly no, I was basing that off several stories I have read and news reports that have retracted the earlier statements that the guy rammed the officer.
Phone may have recorded scene of police shooting | Dallas | News from Fort Worth, Dallas...
Even a gut ailment can't keep him down!
No its notWhen I say odd, I guess I mean, 41 is a hard number to account for mathematically.
That is fair. What is even more fair is if you would so state rather than making a qualative statement.
That is fair. What is even more fair is if you would so state rather than making a qualative statement.
No its not
Pickin nits are ya, bored? I'm fairly certain I've read it was a glock pistol. I always figured just about anyone in that type situation, with the adrenaline dump, would pull the trigger until the magazine was empty. That's where I'm having a hard time finding a way to 41. It was just a statement regarding the math, not a reference to excessive shots or anything.
Still moving, still a threat. If you've gotta reload to get him to stop his BS, reload and keep on shooting.
You are just overthinkingPickin nits are ya, bored? I'm fairly certain I've read it was a glock pistol. I always figured just about anyone in that type situation, with the adrenaline dump, would pull the trigger until the magazine was empty. That's where I'm having a hard time finding a way to 41. It was just a statement regarding the math, not a reference to excessive shots or anything.
Your belief about most people is wrong.You misunderstood, I know "still moving still a threat, reload and repeat." I was saying most people would tend to empty EVERY magazine that they loaded. Therefore making 41 an odd number.
You are just overthinking
And I love how the fact that he "hit the suspect at least once and missed innocent bystanders completely" is considered bad. I for one applaud the fact that he hit the suspect but "missed innocent bystanders completely" as that is an indication of he was doing his job right!
And I love the fact that you cannot see humor unless a LOL emoticon is used. You obviously missed the recent NYC threads.