Pistol Brace Amnesty/Registration

[toddnjoyce]

Pretty much all the cases except NRAs has had a succesful injunction.

Looking at the NRA docket, Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc. v. Garland (1:23-cv-00024), that lawsuit is a mess so far.

"

 

[benenglish]

Glad I've been a life member of the SAF for over a decade. Their lawsuit got an injunction, too.

 

[V-Tach]

Yes.........Paxton delivers.......even though most dislike the man...........

 

[gll]

Lol! An injunction against the rule for all of Texas...

 

[vmax]

Lol! An injunction against the rule for all of Texas...

I just watched that an hr ago

So if you are a resident of Texas you are covered, if you are a GOA member you are covered and if you are a FPC member you're covered..some of us are triple covered..plus the FU factor to begin with that they didn't have the authority to do this in the 1st place

 

[gll]

What I like about the decision is that despite there being other minor plaintiffs, this really sets Texas apart!

And apart is where I think Texas really ought to be... #TEXIT

 

[toddnjoyce]

Lol! An injunction against the rule for all of Texas...

Haven’t watched it yet

I just watched that an hr ago

So if you are a resident of Texas you are covered,

Unless something has changed, that is not what the injunction says.

See bottom of page 7.

https://www.gunowners.org/wp-content/uploads/Tipton-Order.pdf

 

[Otto_Mation]

I am a member of all three organization and live in the state of Texas, so that's like wearing two belts and two sets of suspenders. No worries getting caught with my pants down here.

 

[gll]

Haven’t watched it yet



Unless something has changed, that is not what the injunction says.

See bottom of page 7.

https://www.gunowners.org/wp-content/uploads/Tipton-Order.pdf

So much for trusting lawyers...

 

[Otto_Mation]

The thing that concerns me is that it seems that all of the other cases are hanging their hats on Mock v Garland. I am afraid that it that case goes down they all go down. I hope that is not the case though

 

[V-Tach]

Is that from the clarification of parties relieved or the original?

 

[toddnjoyce]

Is that from the clarification of parties relieved or the original?

That is the final as posted on GOA’s website. If there is a clarification for GOA’s suit, it has not been filed in PACER.

The only clarification on parties that I’ve physically seen is FPCs.

 

[smittyb]

 

[vmax]

Is that from the clarification of parties relieved or the original?

@toddnjoyce

Watch the video..he displays a clarification from the court, explaining that residents are covered

 

[toddnjoyce]

@toddnjoyce

Watch the video..he displays a clarification from the court, explaining that residents are covered

Are you referring to this text?

That come’s from the paragraph in the final order above the limitation to direct employees of the State. Or are you referring to this part that was shown at 6:35 where he says “and apparently also…”

As a bar member, Kirk may have info that’s not in PACER, but I think he’s speeding in that analysis. I’ll keep an eye on the docket and hopefully I’m wrong, but until I see the expanded order in the docket, it doesn’t exist as public information.

There’s at least a couple of comments bringing this up, as well.

 

[vmax]

Are you referring to this text?

That come’s from the paragraph in the final order above the limitation to direct employees of the State. Or are you referring to this part that was shown at 6:35 where he says “and apparently also…”

As a bar member, Kirk may have info that’s not in PACER, but I think he’s speeding in that analysis. I’ll keep an eye on the docket and hopefully I’m wrong, but until I see the expanded order in the docket, it doesn’t exist as public information.

There’s at least a couple of comments bringing this up, as well.

What he said at about the 2:30 mark I believe

 

[toddnjoyce]

What he said at about the 2:30 mark I believe

Yeah. His analysis does not match the available order.

 

[Byrd666]

This whole damned situation is getting more and more tiresome and angering.

 

[majormadmax]

If this is true, being in the TXSG I'm covered as a state employee!

 

[toddnjoyce]

View attachment 390644

If this is true, being in the TXSG I'm covered as a state employee!

See post 1387 for a link to the actual injunction, but if you complied thru the special f1 process, it’s meaningless for you [ETA: for the time being].

If any of these suits are successful, it will be interesting to see how a remedy is applied to those who have added items to the registry.