Pistol Brace Amnesty/Registration

[Twobravo]

Happy for you, but f**k the ATF for taking so long to approve my Form 1!

The sheer idiocy of the fact that anyone would have to wait for the slow administrative process to be completed before swapping a brace like this (Magpul SBA3, now worth zip) for a stock like that (Magpul CTR) makes my blood boil!

View attachment 396118

And before anyone (especially the ATF!) gets overexcited and hyperventilates, those are two separate images from the Interwebz!

No constructive possession is occurring or presumed/assumed!

Screw all those cucks Oklahoma says FU on the bullshit .

 

[Twobravo]

Abbott needs to jump on the FU wagon with us.

 

[majormadmax]

77 days--the amount of time since I submitted my Form 1--can be converted to one of these units:

• 6,652,800 seconds
• 110,880 minutes
• 1848 hours
• 77 days
• 11 weeks
• 21.10% of 2023

 

[PinnedandRecessed]

77 days--the amount of time since I submitted my Form 1--can be converted to one of these units:

• 6,652,800 seconds
• 110,880 minutes
• 1848 hours
• 77 days
• 11 weeks
• 21.10% of 2023

Something tells me priorities have shifted. Rest assured, I know for a fact there are others that have been waiting longer.

 

[vmax]

Abbott needs to jump on the FU wagon with us.

Maybe roll up on the wagon with a ramp

 

[jimbo]

I did silencer shop cause they included prints and I want to do a suppressor too after this and they have prints on file so...

Still waiting.

I used Silencer Shop and used their kiosk to complete forms and post a picture and fingerprints and got mine back approved in 29 days. Cost me $50 but I think it was worth it.

 

[PinnedandRecessed]

I used Silencer Shop and used their kiosk to complete forms and post a picture and fingerprints and got mine back approved in 29 days. Cost me $50 but I think it was worth it.

I also used Silencer Shop....forms certified etc etc. 84 days and waiting....

 

[candcallen]

I also used Silencer Shop....forms certified etc etc. 84 days and waiting....

More than me. 64 I think.

 

[PinnedandRecessed]

More than me. 64 I think.

What can I say? Government efficiency/ineptitude in action.

 

[Twobravo]

Maybe roll up on the wagon with a ramp

And I said that even though Oklahoma’s Governor Stitt is a rhino he’ll flip back and forth on stuff. At first he was gtg then he did a couple things that pissed the people off.

 

[majormadmax]

Something tells me priorities have shifted. Rest assured, I know for a fact there are others that have been waiting longer.

And rest assured, others who have gotten Form 1s approved in less time...

 

[toddnjoyce]

And rest assured, others who have gotten Form 1s approved in less time...

Q: How does BATFE know who is and who is not protected by the various injunctions?

 

[vmax]

And I said that even though Oklahoma’s Governor Stitt is a rhino he’ll flip back and forth on stuff. At first he was gtg then he did a couple things that pissed the people off.

I was making a joke because he is in a wheelchair

 

[thescoutranch]

Just curious about some thing that popped into my head. The ATF claims only 250,000 applications were made for the pistol brace amnesty.

Does that give them leverage for an argument that pistol races are not in common usage since theoretically only 250,000 were registered and thus “legal”.

I’ve heard that there were tens of millions sold, but in the ATF claim that those were destroyed since they were not registered and that’s not in “common use” anymore?

 

[brashears9567]

Just curious about some thing that popped into my head. The ATF claims only 250,000 applications were made for the pistol brace amnesty.

Does that give them leverage for an argument that pistol races are not in common usage since theoretically only 250,000 were registered and thus “legal”.

I’ve heard that there were tens of millions sold, but in the ATF claim that those were destroyed since they were not registered and that’s not in “common use” anymore?

Why would the FATF claim they were destroyed? They did not become illegal to own. Again, FATF.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[oldag]

Just curious about some thing that popped into my head. The ATF claims only 250,000 applications were made for the pistol brace amnesty.

Does that give them leverage for an argument that pistol races are not in common usage since theoretically only 250,000 were registered and thus “legal”.

I’ve heard that there were tens of millions sold, but in the ATF claim that those were destroyed since they were not registered and that’s not in “common use” anymore?

Somebody is thinking too much.

 

[TheMailMan]

Just curious about some thing that popped into my head. The ATF claims only 250,000 applications were made for the pistol brace amnesty.

Does that give them leverage for an argument that pistol races are not in common usage since theoretically only 250,000 were registered and thus “legal”.

I’ve heard that there were tens of millions sold, but in the ATF claim that those were destroyed since they were not registered and that’s not in “common use” anymore?

Registration was only one way to comply.

 

[thescoutranch]

Registration was only one way to comply.

Right,

1. You could remove the brace from your firearm, which means it is not in use anymore.

2. You could register the brace

3. you could destroy the brace.

I think these were the only way you could come into compliance, but I could be mistaken.

So what I was thinking was; only the ones that got registered are actually “in use” and in compliance and thus, legal.

Would this enable the ATF to come back and claim that only 250,000 were in use, this would be a small enough number, that they could say they are not in common use, and therefore fall under the NFA.

And yes, I probably am over thinking this, but this is the ATF were talking about.

 

[brashears9567]

Right,

1. You could remove the brace from your firearm, which means it is not in use anymore.

2. You could register the brace

3. you could destroy the brace.

I think these were the only way you could come into compliance, but I could be mistaken.

So what I was thinking was; only the ones that got registered are actually “in use” and in compliance and thus, legal.

Would this enable the ATF to come back and claim that only 250,000 were in use, this would be a small enough number, that they could say they are not in common use, and therefore fall under the NFA.

And yes, I probably am over thinking this, but this is the ATF were talking about.

Well, mine are "in use" on rifles, so there is that...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Otto_Mation]

2. You could register the brace

3. you could destroy the brace.

2. You could register the rifle, not the brace

3. You could destroy or turn in the SBR and I don't think any reasonable person would do that.

You can not register a brace.