Military Camp

Popular Bipod Review

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • easy rider

    Summer Slacker
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 10, 2015
    31,492
    96
    Odessa, Tx
    I have one Atlas bipod with QD. At the range I mostly use a rest, but for the times a rest isn't practical I can quickly switch between rifles.
    Military Camp
     

    benenglish

    Just Another Boomer
    Staff member
    Lifetime Member
    Admin
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Nov 22, 2011
    23,934
    96
    Spring
    Just saw a TV program where this rifle was briefly shown. What bipod is that? Anybody know?

    DGmCNmn.jpg
     

    Attachments

    • DGmCNmn.jpg
      DGmCNmn.jpg
      18.6 KB · Views: 728

    benenglish

    Just Another Boomer
    Staff member
    Lifetime Member
    Admin
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Nov 22, 2011
    23,934
    96
    Spring
    Is this it?
    Looks like it.
    Generally something that close and low doesn't affect your view.

    Try it sometime. Strange but you really don't notice any difference.
    I don't mean to derail completely, but this is something that has always fascinated me.

    Since I'm not a bipod user, there's probably some practical reason that almost every bipod goes under the barrel. However, from a simple physics point of view, it always seemed intuitive to me that a bipod that attached above the barrel, leaving the major weight hanging below, would be inherently more stable.

    Since stability is (I think, but not being a user I could be completely wrong) the primary goal, I've often wondered why most bipods weren't designed to suspend the weight of the rifle in this manner.
     

    easy rider

    Summer Slacker
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 10, 2015
    31,492
    96
    Odessa, Tx
    Looks like it.

    I don't mean to derail completely, but this is something that has always fascinated me.

    Since I'm not a bipod user, there's probably some practical reason that almost every bipod goes under the barrel. However, from a simple physics point of view, it always seemed intuitive to me that a bipod that attached above the barrel, leaving the major weight hanging below, would be inherently more stable.

    Since stability is (I think, but not being a user I could be completely wrong) the primary goal, I've often wondered why most bipods weren't designed to suspend the weight of the rifle in this manner.
    I haven't tried that type, but part of the stability is to push it forward somewhat to stabilize it better, and it would seem to me that there would be a bit more stress and possible movement of the forend having it suspended. I would have to see it being used to know for sure, but it would also limit the type of rifle.
     

    Younggun

    Certified Jackass
    TGT Supporter
    Local Business Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Jul 31, 2011
    53,622
    96
    hill co.
    It’s probably a matter of simplicity in original designs and the. Doing something the way it’s always been done.


    Look at most rifles. The action is nearly always higher that the butt of the rifle. Some in line. An AR has the action in line with the top of the butt. But I had the opportunity to get behind a rifle built so that the action was actually below the point of contact with the shoulder. It was extremely comfortable. It was built so that when shooting from a bipod or other rest the muzzle would not jump. I didn’t get to shoot it but watching it being shot it really didn’t move at all. I think it was a 300WM or 7mm-300.

    If I ever have a few thousand bucks laying around I would love to let them build me a rifle.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     

    Dawico

    Uncoiled
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 100%
    14   0   0
    Oct 15, 2009
    38,009
    96
    Lampasas, Texas
    Looks like it.

    I don't mean to derail completely, but this is something that has always fascinated me.

    Since I'm not a bipod user, there's probably some practical reason that almost every bipod goes under the barrel. However, from a simple physics point of view, it always seemed intuitive to me that a bipod that attached above the barrel, leaving the major weight hanging below, would be inherently more stable.

    Since stability is (I think, but not being a user I could be completely wrong) the primary goal, I've often wondered why most bipods weren't designed to suspend the weight of the rifle in this manner.

    Under the foreend designs are much simpler to create. Most rifles don't have the means to mount above the barrel.

    Many more expensive bipods have a wide mounting area that allows the legs to run inline with the barrel or above it while still mounting under the rifle. They also have a wide leg spread. They are very stable.

    Once you get beyond folding/ compact systems the bipods get very stable.
     

    Dawico

    Uncoiled
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 100%
    14   0   0
    Oct 15, 2009
    38,009
    96
    Lampasas, Texas
    I haven't tried that type, but part of the stability is to push it forward somewhat to stabilize it better, and it would seem to me that there would be a bit more stress and possible movement of the forend having it suspended. I would have to see it being used to know for sure, but it would also limit the type of rifle.
    I have moved away from loading the bipod. Many fancier bipods have skis that don't allow it to grab anyways.

    This helps alleviate pressure on the mount and fore end.

    I find I shoot better without being able to push on the rifle.
     

    Dawico

    Uncoiled
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 100%
    14   0   0
    Oct 15, 2009
    38,009
    96
    Lampasas, Texas
    I found a good deal on a Magpul bipod and consider it a decent contender in the ~$100 bipod field.

    Built in mounts are available for Picatinny rails, M-lok, and the A.R.M.S. #17S quick disconnect system (connector not included).

    I went with Picatinny since that is the most versatile.

    Overall it is a decent bipod with some different features than other bipods in its price range. Being Magpul it has a lot of plastic in its construction but seems to be a tough and well built unit.

    It has a tilt feature with a nut to lock it down. The same nut locks down the pan feature but that can easily be locked out completely too.

    The legs only lock in the deployed position so it is fast to set up. Springs hold the legs folded and do a good job of holding them up.

    Pushing a button allows the legs to be lengthened and they lock in solid. They do rattle though.

    It starts about an inch taller than the Atlas and has about the same adjustment range.

    The rubber feet can be removed and replaced with Atlas units (right from the Magpul literature) so a wide variety of quality feet can be used.

    All in all it fits right into the Harris price range of bipods with good features and a quality build. Being mostly plastic in construction it just can't compete with the pure strength of many of the other units but for the price and features it is a good option and a good looking piece.

    I don't have any range time on it but don't see any issues with recommending it if you want a bipod that is a little different than many of the others available.
    7064c55f730702b5d35597a714738aef.jpg
    fbaa213d29bb0e71c7b99aa441fe7dc2.jpg
    978fef479b5cc929ed6daf47bac317c1.jpg
     

    Attachments

    • 7064c55f730702b5d35597a714738aef.jpg
      7064c55f730702b5d35597a714738aef.jpg
      47.2 KB · Views: 909
    • fbaa213d29bb0e71c7b99aa441fe7dc2.jpg
      fbaa213d29bb0e71c7b99aa441fe7dc2.jpg
      50.9 KB · Views: 909
    • 978fef479b5cc929ed6daf47bac317c1.jpg
      978fef479b5cc929ed6daf47bac317c1.jpg
      53.9 KB · Views: 886

    Dawico

    Uncoiled
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 100%
    14   0   0
    Oct 15, 2009
    38,009
    96
    Lampasas, Texas
    Found another bipod that I figured was worth a review. Yes, I have a problem.

    Let me just state that I am not a big UTG fan. They generally make and sell items that I don't feel belong on a serious firearm.

    The UTG Recon Flex bipod kind of breaks that thinking for me. In the ~$50 range this is a very nice system but only fits KeyMod or M-Lok fore ends.

    The legs lock in 5 different positions, forward and back up and at a 45° angle and straight down similar to the more expensive bipods. An easy to use collar makes adjusting them simple and fast. Notches hold the legs extended or retracted.

    This system does have a few features not found on the more expensive models.

    The angle cuts on the back of the length adjusting notches allows you to pull the legs out without squeezing the release latch. They do not slide back in though. Once out they stay out.

    The legs also have a thumb wheel which allows you to fine tune the height if you are on an uneven surface. It is nice to have this option along with the preset notches.

    Since the bipod halves mount to the side of the fore end it opens up some unique possibilities. This keeps the bottom of the rail clear for other attachments that a normal bipod would be in the way of. It also folds up in line with the rifle barrel not under it like most.

    If your fore end allows this system to mount then I recommend looking at it as an option especially if budget is a concern. The price tag does not reflect the innovation brought by this system.

    So far I really like what I see but haven't put it to hard use yet so the overall quality and longevity is still untested by me. It is mostly metal parts though so it should hold up fairly well.
    7cf0ea8574d72a5ee9c7e02b059f6b0b.jpg
    974cbf43a9e9580ac6678f0d3f3832a3.jpg
    d39cf31f6b271e17cf9cae1a06dc42e5.jpg
    4e834bf702cef0b50e370e237e8939c4.jpg
    93eab40777c1abfadde9d0459112d266.jpg
    ee46ea9d2a67d9e6fcd0a8be34efb394.jpg
     

    Attachments

    • 7cf0ea8574d72a5ee9c7e02b059f6b0b.jpg
      7cf0ea8574d72a5ee9c7e02b059f6b0b.jpg
      55.1 KB · Views: 844
    • 974cbf43a9e9580ac6678f0d3f3832a3.jpg
      974cbf43a9e9580ac6678f0d3f3832a3.jpg
      47.7 KB · Views: 831
    • d39cf31f6b271e17cf9cae1a06dc42e5.jpg
      d39cf31f6b271e17cf9cae1a06dc42e5.jpg
      45.7 KB · Views: 885
    • 4e834bf702cef0b50e370e237e8939c4.jpg
      4e834bf702cef0b50e370e237e8939c4.jpg
      28.6 KB · Views: 828
    • 93eab40777c1abfadde9d0459112d266.jpg
      93eab40777c1abfadde9d0459112d266.jpg
      45.8 KB · Views: 841
    • ee46ea9d2a67d9e6fcd0a8be34efb394.jpg
      ee46ea9d2a67d9e6fcd0a8be34efb394.jpg
      41.4 KB · Views: 843

    Dawico

    Uncoiled
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 100%
    14   0   0
    Oct 15, 2009
    38,009
    96
    Lampasas, Texas
    Had a member ask me about the UTG bipods clearing a 30 round magazine so I figured I would add the information here.

    The regular height bipod does clear a 30 round magazine while fully extended.

    UTG also has a taller version available. The shorter adjusts from 5.7" to 8". The taller from 8" to 12". These measurements are from mounting point which is center of barrel.

    A few pics to show them mounted on a few AR pistols I had handy with 30 round P Mags.

    Both fully retracted first then fully extended.
    ac5ca82587be7f65748a849a473e299b.jpg
    3fffc95be85fa7e767431002f5538da5.jpg
     

    Attachments

    • ac5ca82587be7f65748a849a473e299b.jpg
      ac5ca82587be7f65748a849a473e299b.jpg
      48.9 KB · Views: 798
    • 3fffc95be85fa7e767431002f5538da5.jpg
      3fffc95be85fa7e767431002f5538da5.jpg
      49.6 KB · Views: 828

    Big Green

    In Christ Alone
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Mar 5, 2018
    4,641
    96
    College Station
    Current rifle build is getting close to being finished and now I’m shopping bipods. I’m leaning towards Atlas PSR NC and M-Lok adapter. Thoughts?
     

    Dawico

    Uncoiled
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 100%
    14   0   0
    Oct 15, 2009
    38,009
    96
    Lampasas, Texas
    Current rifle build is getting close to being finished and now I’m shopping bipods. I’m leaning towards Atlas PSR NC and M-Lok adapter. Thoughts?
    They're nice. Mine all have rotating legs and they spin if you load them.

    I always struggle with the mounting system though. I usually go Picatinny and then put adapters on as I like the versatility of being able to move them around.

    Probably not an issue for most buyers. Something to think about long term though.
     
    Top Bottom