Sounds like they applied the formula:
A : number in the field
B : rate if failure
C : cost of the out of court settlement
AxBxC > cost of recall
Fight Club?!
Sounds like they applied the formula:
A : number in the field
B : rate if failure
C : cost of the out of court settlement
AxBxC > cost of recall
I have an SPS that is subject to the recall. Does anyone know what is done in the recall? The SPS has a great trigger and I don't want to get it back with a 12 pound trigger pull. I have a Timney trigger that I've never installed. I'd rather install the Timney than to have them trash my rifle.
Flash
I got my 700 SPS back from the recall after a little over one month. It was returned with a 5 pound trigger pull which is OK for me. I do NOT like extremely light trigger pulls!
Regarding the Jewell trigger replacement, I have a Timney for the 700 that I've never installed so I called Timney to ask if THAT installation would negate the need for the recall. Their reply was "NO." Timney uses the Remington standard rifle safety and their trigger would still require the service on the safety.
I pressed this question very forcefully and Remington was not generous with their information. What I discovered was that a bonding agent (spelled glue or epoxy) was on the safety where it shouldn't have been and the recall was made to clean and/or replace the safety parts.
The process included Remington sending me a prepaid shipping box and it shipped back prepaid, too. The only hitch was that the return shipment required an adult signature and the damned thing came in at 7 PM! I sandbagged the entire day waiting for that box! All things considered, it was fairly painless.
The reason that I sent the rifle in to Remington was for liability concerns. I've heard it all about "Never trust the safety" but if a rifle has a safety installed, it must work properly. If I knew the rifle needed the recall and failed to have the work done, if (God Forbid!) anything happened with the rifle, I'd be negligent. If I sold the rifle and didn't have the recall done, I may also be negligent. Besides, the recall cost me nothing. It simply made sense to do this by the book.
Flash
The second difference is that our 510 trigger comes with a trigger blocking safety; that means there's no way to move the trigger when it's on safe, so when you take it off safe the trigger stays in the same position it started from. Remember though, firearms are dangerous; there is only one way to prevent injuries with a firearm Keep It Pointed In A Safe Direction AT ALL TIMES.
Flash, I got the box but no prepaid label, looks like I need to call Remington tomorrow. I got my 700 used so I figure sending it to the factory for a once over, cleaning and new trigger is a bonus for me. I planned to eventually pop a Timney in it anyway, I love the one on my AR.
Yes sir - I understand the issues with the x-mark trigger, but my personal experiences go way (in years) beyond that.As I understand it, the recall is for the XMark trigger, no?
In other news, not a recall but Remington finally settles class action on Walker trigger problems:
Settlement Reached in Suit Over Remington Rifles
ST. LOUIS — Jul 8, 2014, 3:26 PM ET
By JIM SALTER Associated Press
200 BadRequest
"Remington has sold more than 5 million of the rifles since 1948. The lawsuit claimed that Model 700 rifles "are subject to unexpected firing without a trigger pull."
My post was about the earlier Walker trigger. Class action settlement just reached, may or may not involve recall. I see the link isn't working. I'll try to fix it.Yes sir - I understand the issues with the x-mark trigger, but my personal experiences go way (in years) beyond that.
Fight Club?!