Anyone else chomping at the bit for Ruger to put a SR45c into production? I was considering a 40c, but might just wait to see if it happens.
Want...to...tell you...9mm is better...trying to re...sist...argh! SR45 is very cool. I really don't see why they wouldn't make a compact since they did in 9/40. What do you think the magazine capacity would be? 6/7 or?
I would hope for a 7+1 but who knows. I currently own a SR9c and was thinking about buying the .40 to carry and just use the 9 to shoot/pratice as 9mm is much more cost effective at the range. Although I want to see a .45, would you guys rather have 7+1 rnds of .45 or the 10+1 rounds of 9mm?
I love the concept of 9+1 (.40) for carry and the spare magazine of 15 Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk
Man. I knew it would come to this. Take the 40 or 45 hype out of the equation and ask...would you rather have 8 rounds in a gun or 11?
I would think so. However it's like any tool, each has it's own purpose. If i wanted a .45 just for the amount of firepower, I'd choose an FNX-45 (3X15, now that's firepower on your belt). but the SR compact gives you that really good concealable firearm, then slap the extended magazine in. (That would even make a Zombie think twice)
