Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Politics' started by navyguy, Jun 29, 2009.
Another reason not to put her on tha SC.
I am LOVING it!!!!! :happy0001::happy0001:
So blatant racism ISN'T constitutional? Go figure...:headscratch:
Guys, a 5-4 decison that racism isn't constitutional is nothing to celebrate.
Should have been 9-0. I was cheesed, to say the least, when I heard the vote count.
Here's how it was explained:
And with 4 conservatives, 4 liberals and one moderate currently on the SCOTUS that's what you will get in such cases. That's why appointments are so important and must be fought for.
BTW, when my house is on fire, I don't want dummies coming to put it out.
Every year that goes by with the Pinko in Chief inthe WHite House makes a repeat 5-4 vote on cases like this less and less likely and the probably outcome negative for liberty, personal freedoms and constitutional rights.
Like it was said'