Well we were all waiting for one of your nature to come out! As far as making sense your right . We do have the right . I want to keep it . If you do not think we have a problem here all you have to do is look at london , Great Britan? . One small change leads to another. The so called (Freedom of choice act) is not what it seems! It's actualy totaly reverse!!! I do not know about you but I'm a tax payer and I believe that the goverment should not have the right to force a clinic that does not want to perform abortions do just that . Also I do not want to have to pay for our countries abortions out of my taxes that have been paid just because people cant keep their legs closed! Not only that but the bill if passed will allow for our tax payers money to provide abortions in other foreign countries as well! Simply put ! This bill should be called "NO FREEDOM OR CHOICE ACT" !I don't particularly care to fight the right to bare arms. We already have the right to bare arms. In fact, during the summer, short sleeves are almost mandatory. I don't know why we would want to fight our existing right to bear arms either. Your post makes little sense.
John Ross said:Abortion is NEVER going to be legally unavailable. NO ONE in a viable position of political power supports imprisoning women who have had abortions. So the worst that can happen is that abortions will cost more, because you may have to travel farther to get a safe, legal one. How many abortions might you need to have? Five in a lifetime? Ten? Ten trips to somewhere with safe, legal abortion doctors is a lot cheaper than losing most of what you have to Socialist fiscal policies or losing your life to terrorist attack. Get real.