Known problem with them. Stored ammo detonation. Kinda like their ships.
Hmm kinda like a Ford Pinto. Low cost lighter good on gas. But sometimes goes boom!Problem may not be the right word. Russian tanks use a 3 man crew with an auto loader which means they tend to be smaller, lighter, and need less fuel. American tanks are larger with a 4 man crew so the ammo can be stored in compartments more easily but overall it’s a larger and heavier vehicle.
It’s a problem in a way, but also just the decision they made in balancing crew survivability with combat abilities, cost, overall size and weight, fuel requirements, etc.
I'm not surprise at all.
Ukraine for now greatest (check image)
Hmm kinda like a Ford Pinto. Low cost lighter good on gas. But sometimes goes boom!
Believe me, Ukranian government extremely happy.
Most important Q. You happy?
Comment for image; "yeah baby, dance baby!!!"
Are you referring to the aircraft or the ALCM's ability to survive enemy air defenses?The point is that Russia has successfully engaged targets with air launched cruise missiles, which implies an ability to negate enemy air defenses. Avoidance is sometimes the easiest way.
Even in those successful engagements, there’s still wonderment at why the warheads aren’t performing as they did elsewhere.
Ukraine: Russia’s air-launched cruise missiles coming up short
Russia’s war on Ukraine has exposed problems with Moscow’s long-range air-launched cruise missile inventory, with the weapons suffering from an unexpectedly high failure rate according to the United States.www.iiss.org
Either our past assessments were really wrong, our current assessments are really wrong, or we don’t understand what it is that Putin really wants.
Considering Renault just handed over something like a $9B investment in auto manufacturing for a ruble (about $0.11), McDonald’s is about to take a multi-billion dollar bath as it walks away from it’s operations, and the US treasury is set to let the sanctions carve out that lets Russia service it’s debt to US investors next week, it’s likely we will see A default their, too. That’s real monetary losses with real assets, modern technology, and IP the west is walking away from and Russia is getting for free.
If the Chinese can half-ass reverse engineer and produce shitty products they can dump on the world for stable currency incomes, Russia can probably do it, too. Makes me wonder if the real goal is force a reset to a first/second world era.
If you’ve hung on this long, one more thing to consider. Russia has done a lot of foreign military sales with formerly US aligned countries. I wonder how comfortable they are feeling in those investments now. Murphy’s law and all that.
I'm tracking...with a cruise missile you kinda need to know the location of the target to hit it and you need your target to still be there once it gets there.I meant Russian intelligence on Ukraine would need to remain very up to date in order to target mobile SAM sites with any high degree of success using cruise missiles. Assuming Ukraine actually moved their mobile SAM sites regularly.
It’s a problem in a way, but also just the decision they made in balancing crew survivability with combat abilities, cost, overall size and weight, fuel requirements, etc.
It's the only reason to armor a vehicle...Has survivability ever been a consideration for the Rus?
Sent from my SM-G715A using Tapatalk