Axxe55
Retiretgtshit stirrer
Don't need Senators, they passed it 18-4. Need Representatives.
You are correct. It is representatives and not senators.
Don't need Senators, they passed it 18-4. Need Representatives.
Could that be because of wishy washy republicans?I hope you are not forgetting that democraps never seem to get in trouble for anything they do. This whole thing is just going to make them heroes in front of their constituents, and they have no reason to stop this civil unrest.
Maybe none of the Republicans want their houses burned down by peaceful demonstrators.Could that be because of wishy washy republicans?
Maybe none of the Republicans want their houses burned down by peaceful demonstrators.
Imagine where our country would be if the founding fathers felt that way.Maybe none of the Republicans want their houses burned down by peaceful demonstrators.
Imagine where our country would be if the founding fathers felt that way.
I totally agree but perhaps we should employ some of the tactics that they use. Perhaps like taking any conservative that votes with the libs on any issue take away their seats from any panel, or comittee they are on and blacklist them. That's how the democraps keep people in-line. To many Republicans feel that playing fair and reaching across the aisle is good. Sort of like full me once a lot and have no clue it's not going to work.Maybe people should grow a spine and start holding people accountable for their actions, or show them such behavior has consequences.
I totally agree but perhaps we should employ some of the tactics that they use. Perhaps like taking any conservative that votes with the libs on any issue take away their seats from any panel, or comittee they are on and blacklist them. That's how the democraps keep people in-line. To many Republicans feel that playing fair and reaching across the aisle is good. Sort of like full me once a lot and have no clue it's not going to work.
Sorry I got off track of the original post.
Which State(s) supplied NG to DC? (don't recall off top of my head, but they were invited)As @easy rider mentioned, jurisdiction.
It's okay for Pelosi to intrude and ignore jurisdictions, but not for others. And surely not because they are fellow commies like herself.
So how is removing them from leadership positions in the House for abandoning their duty "lying, cheating, etc."?Sure. Let's resort to the philosophy that two wrongs equal a right.
It's kind of hard to stand on the higher moral ground when you are lying, cheating and doing all sorts of wrong just because the opposition does.
How does anyone know who is right when both sides are doing the same thing?
Or let them opt to never come back.The warrant is issued by the House Sergeant at Arms and is not a criminal warrant. It can only be enforced by the Sergeant at Arms or his specific appointee. He’ll have to wait until those chickenshîts come back before it can be served.
So how is removing them from leadership positions in the House for abandoning their duty "lying, cheating, etc."?
Now you're just dreaming!Or let them opt to never come back.
Works for me.